Demographics details for Cherokee, OK vs Litchfield, ME
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Cherokee, OK vs Litchfield, ME.
| Data | Cherokee | Litchfield |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 48,098 | 3,642 |
| Median Age | 36.5 years | 42.0 years |
| Median Income | $52,410 | $85,000 |
| Married Families | 38.0% | 60.0% |
| Poverty Level | 15% | 5% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.6 | 2.5 |
Population Comparison: Cherokee vs Litchfield
- In Cherokee, the population is higher at 48,098, compared to 3,642 in Litchfield.
- The median age in Litchfield is higher at 42.0 years, compared to 36.5 years in Cherokee.
- Litchfield has a higher median income of $85,000, compared to $52,410 in Cherokee.
- In Litchfield, the percentage of married families is higher at 60.0%, compared to 38.0% in Cherokee.
- Cherokee has a higher poverty level at 15% compared to 5% in Litchfield.
- The unemployment rate in Cherokee is higher at 4.6%, compared to 2.5% in Litchfield.
Demographics
Demographics Cherokee vs Litchfield provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Cherokee | Litchfield |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 1 | 1 |
| White | 42 | 96 |
| Asian | 1 | 1 |
| Hispanic | 8 | 1 |
| Two or More Races | 15 | 1 |
| American Indian | 33 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Cherokee vs Litchfield
- The percentage of Black residents is the same in both Cherokee and Litchfield at 1%.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Litchfield at 96% compared to 42% in Cherokee.
- Both Cherokee and Litchfield have the same percentage of Asian residents at 1%.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Cherokee at 8% compared to 1% in Litchfield.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Cherokee at 15% compared to 1% in Litchfield.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Cherokee at 33% compared to 0% in Litchfield.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Cherokee | Litchfield |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 20.2% | Data is updating% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 14.6% | Data is updating% |
| Depression | 26.6% | Data is updating% |
| Smoking | 23.2% | Data is updating% |
| Binge Drinking | 13.8% | Data is updating% |
| Obesity | 43.7% | Data is updating% |
| Disability Percentage | 19.0% | Data is updating% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Cherokee vs Litchfield
- More residents in Cherokee report poor mental health at 20.2% compared to 0.0% in Litchfield.
- Depression is more prevalent in Cherokee at 26.6% compared to 0.0% in Litchfield.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Cherokee at 23.2% compared to 0.0% in Litchfield.
- Binge drinking is more common in Cherokee at 13.8% compared to 0.0% in Litchfield.
- Obesity rates are higher in Cherokee at 43.7% compared to 0.0% in Litchfield.
- Disability percentages are higher in Cherokee at 19.0% compared to 0.0% in Litchfield.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Cherokee | Litchfield |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.9% (433) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 15.6% (7,526) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| Less than High School | 11.5% (5,552) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 17.9% (8,612) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
Education Levels Comparison: Cherokee vs Litchfield
- A higher percentage of residents in Cherokee have no formal schooling at 0.9% compared to 0.0% in Litchfield.
- A higher percentage of residents in Cherokee hold a high school diploma at 15.6% compared to 0.0% in Litchfield.
- More residents in Cherokee have less than a high school education at 11.5% compared to 0.0% in Litchfield.
- A higher percentage of residents in Cherokee hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 17.9% compared to 0.0% in Litchfield.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.