Demographics details for Cherokee, OK vs Farmington, NM
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Cherokee, OK vs Farmington, NM.
| Data | Cherokee | Farmington |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 48,098 | 46,127 |
| Median Age | 36.5 years | 35.7 years |
| Median Income | $52,410 | $61,388 |
| Married Families | 38.0% | 34.0% |
| Poverty Level | 15% | 10% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.6 | 5.2 |
Population Comparison: Cherokee vs Farmington
- In Cherokee, the population is higher at 48,098, compared to 46,127 in Farmington.
- Residents in Cherokee have a higher median age of 36.5 years compared to 35.7 years in Farmington.
- Farmington has a higher median income of $61,388, compared to $52,410 in Cherokee.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Cherokee at 38.0% compared to 34.0% in Farmington.
- Cherokee has a higher poverty level at 15% compared to 10% in Farmington.
- Farmington has a higher unemployment rate at 5.2% compared to 4.6% in Cherokee.
Demographics
Demographics Cherokee vs Farmington provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Cherokee | Farmington |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 1 | 1 |
| White | 42 | 32 |
| Asian | 1 | 1 |
| Hispanic | 8 | 26 |
| Two or More Races | 15 | 11 |
| American Indian | 33 | 29 |
Demographics Comparison: Cherokee vs Farmington
- The percentage of Black residents is the same in both Cherokee and Farmington at 1%.
- Cherokee has a higher percentage of White residents at 42% compared to 32% in Farmington.
- Both Cherokee and Farmington have the same percentage of Asian residents at 1%.
- Farmington has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 26%, compared to 8% in Cherokee.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Cherokee at 15% compared to 11% in Farmington.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Cherokee at 33% compared to 29% in Farmington.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Cherokee | Farmington |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 20.2% | 17.6% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 14.6% | 12.7% |
| Depression | 26.6% | 20.1% |
| Smoking | 23.2% | 18.2% |
| Binge Drinking | 13.8% | 13.5% |
| Obesity | 43.7% | 34.4% |
| Disability Percentage | 19.0% | 14.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Cherokee vs Farmington
- More residents in Cherokee report poor mental health at 20.2% compared to 17.6% in Farmington.
- Depression is more prevalent in Cherokee at 26.6% compared to 20.1% in Farmington.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Cherokee at 23.2% compared to 18.2% in Farmington.
- Binge drinking is more common in Cherokee at 13.8% compared to 13.5% in Farmington.
- Obesity rates are higher in Cherokee at 43.7% compared to 34.4% in Farmington.
- Disability percentages are higher in Cherokee at 19.0% compared to 14.0% in Farmington.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Cherokee | Farmington |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.9% (433) | 0.5% (211) |
| High School Diploma | 15.6% (7,526) | 13.4% (6,180) |
| Less than High School | 11.5% (5,552) | 12.9% (5,929) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 17.9% (8,612) | 13.0% (5,985) |
Education Levels Comparison: Cherokee vs Farmington
- A higher percentage of residents in Cherokee have no formal schooling at 0.9% compared to 0.5% in Farmington.
- A higher percentage of residents in Cherokee hold a high school diploma at 15.6% compared to 13.4% in Farmington.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Farmington at 12.9%, compared to 11.5% in Cherokee.
- A higher percentage of residents in Cherokee hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 17.9% compared to 13.0% in Farmington.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.