Demographics details for Cherokee, OK vs Cedar park, TX
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Cherokee, OK vs Cedar park, TX.
| Data | Cherokee | Cedar park |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 48,098 | 77,642 |
| Median Age | 36.5 years | 37.6 years |
| Median Income | $52,410 | $118,903 |
| Married Families | 38.0% | 45.0% |
| Poverty Level | 15% | 5% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.6 | 3.6 |
Population Comparison: Cherokee vs Cedar park
- The population in Cedar park is higher at 77,642, compared to 48,098 in Cherokee.
- The median age in Cedar park is higher at 37.6 years, compared to 36.5 years in Cherokee.
- Cedar park has a higher median income of $118,903, compared to $52,410 in Cherokee.
- In Cedar park, the percentage of married families is higher at 45.0%, compared to 38.0% in Cherokee.
- Cherokee has a higher poverty level at 15% compared to 5% in Cedar park.
- The unemployment rate in Cherokee is higher at 4.6%, compared to 3.6% in Cedar park.
Demographics
Demographics Cherokee vs Cedar park provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Cherokee | Cedar park |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 1 | 3 |
| White | 42 | 55 |
| Asian | 1 | 12 |
| Hispanic | 8 | 20 |
| Two or More Races | 15 | 10 |
| American Indian | 33 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Cherokee vs Cedar park
- In Cedar park, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 3% compared to 1% in Cherokee.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Cedar park at 55% compared to 42% in Cherokee.
- In Cedar park, the Asian population stands at 12%, greater than 1% in Cherokee.
- Cedar park has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 20%, compared to 8% in Cherokee.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Cherokee at 15% compared to 10% in Cedar park.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Cherokee at 33% compared to 0% in Cedar park.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Cherokee | Cedar park |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 20.2% | 14.9% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 14.6% | 8.8% |
| Depression | 26.6% | 24.1% |
| Smoking | 23.2% | 11.0% |
| Binge Drinking | 13.8% | 17.9% |
| Obesity | 43.7% | 31.0% |
| Disability Percentage | 19.0% | 8.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Cherokee vs Cedar park
- More residents in Cherokee report poor mental health at 20.2% compared to 14.9% in Cedar park.
- Depression is more prevalent in Cherokee at 26.6% compared to 24.1% in Cedar park.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Cherokee at 23.2% compared to 11.0% in Cedar park.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Cedar park at 17.9% compared to 13.8% in Cherokee.
- Obesity rates are higher in Cherokee at 43.7% compared to 31.0% in Cedar park.
- Disability percentages are higher in Cherokee at 19.0% compared to 8.0% in Cedar park.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Cherokee | Cedar park |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.9% (433) | 0.4% (287) |
| High School Diploma | 15.6% (7,526) | 8.9% (6,896) |
| Less than High School | 11.5% (5,552) | 4.1% (3,156) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 17.9% (8,612) | 35.8% (27,785) |
Education Levels Comparison: Cherokee vs Cedar park
- A higher percentage of residents in Cherokee have no formal schooling at 0.9% compared to 0.4% in Cedar park.
- A higher percentage of residents in Cherokee hold a high school diploma at 15.6% compared to 8.9% in Cedar park.
- More residents in Cherokee have less than a high school education at 11.5% compared to 4.1% in Cedar park.
- In Cedar park, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 35.8% compared to 17.9% in Cherokee.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.