Demographics details for Chauncey, OH vs Ripley, TN
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Chauncey, OH vs Ripley, TN.
| Data | Chauncey | Ripley |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 949 | 7,672 |
| Median Age | 45.9 years | 36.7 years |
| Median Income | $33,803 | $39,454 |
| Married Families | 24.0% | 26.0% |
| Poverty Level | 12% | 18% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 5.2 |
Population Comparison: Chauncey vs Ripley
- The population in Ripley is higher at 7,672, compared to 949 in Chauncey.
- Residents in Chauncey have a higher median age of 45.9 years compared to 36.7 years in Ripley.
- Ripley has a higher median income of $39,454, compared to $33,803 in Chauncey.
- In Ripley, the percentage of married families is higher at 26.0%, compared to 24.0% in Chauncey.
- The poverty level is higher in Ripley at 18%, compared to 12% in Chauncey.
- Ripley has a higher unemployment rate at 5.2% compared to 4.5% in Chauncey.
Demographics
Demographics Chauncey vs Ripley provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Chauncey | Ripley |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 58 |
| White | 99 | 37 |
| Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | Data is updating | 1 |
| Two or More Races | 1 | 4 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Chauncey vs Ripley
- In Ripley, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 58% compared to 0% in Chauncey.
- Chauncey has a higher percentage of White residents at 99% compared to 37% in Ripley.
- Both Chauncey and Ripley have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- Ripley has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 1%, compared to 0% in Chauncey.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Ripley at 4%, compared to 1% in Chauncey.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Chauncey and Ripley at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Chauncey | Ripley |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 19.3% | 23.0% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 14.2% | 17.9% |
| Depression | 28.3% | 27.8% |
| Smoking | 23.1% | 30.2% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.6% | 11.9% |
| Obesity | 38.9% | 45.0% |
| Disability Percentage | 21.0% | 25.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Chauncey vs Ripley
- In Ripley, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 23.0% compared to 19.3% in Chauncey.
- Depression is more prevalent in Chauncey at 28.3% compared to 27.8% in Ripley.
- Ripley has a higher smoking rate at 30.2% compared to 23.1% in Chauncey.
- Binge drinking is more common in Chauncey at 17.6% compared to 11.9% in Ripley.
- Ripley has higher obesity rates at 45.0% compared to 38.9% in Chauncey.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Ripley at 25.0% compared to 21.0% in Chauncey.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Chauncey | Ripley |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.5% (14) | 1.1% (86) |
| High School Diploma | 27.6% (262) | 21.9% (1,679) |
| Less than High School | 19.9% (189) | 15.3% (1,172) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 7.1% (67) | 8.2% (632) |
Education Levels Comparison: Chauncey vs Ripley
- A higher percentage of residents in Chauncey have no formal schooling at 1.5% compared to 1.1% in Ripley.
- A higher percentage of residents in Chauncey hold a high school diploma at 27.6% compared to 21.9% in Ripley.
- More residents in Chauncey have less than a high school education at 19.9% compared to 15.3% in Ripley.
- In Ripley, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 8.2% compared to 7.1% in Chauncey.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.