Demographics details for Chauncey, OH vs Mercer, WI
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Chauncey, OH vs Mercer, WI.
| Data | Chauncey | Mercer |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 949 | 1,732 |
| Median Age | 45.9 years | 55.0 years |
| Median Income | $33,803 | $50,000 |
| Married Families | 24.0% | 35.0% |
| Poverty Level | 12% | 10% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 5.0 |
Population Comparison: Chauncey vs Mercer
- The population in Mercer is higher at 1,732, compared to 949 in Chauncey.
- The median age in Mercer is higher at 55.0 years, compared to 45.9 years in Chauncey.
- Mercer has a higher median income of $50,000, compared to $33,803 in Chauncey.
- In Mercer, the percentage of married families is higher at 35.0%, compared to 24.0% in Chauncey.
- Chauncey has a higher poverty level at 12% compared to 10% in Mercer.
- Mercer has a higher unemployment rate at 5.0% compared to 4.5% in Chauncey.
Demographics
Demographics Chauncey vs Mercer provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Chauncey | Mercer |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| White | 99 | 97 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 1 |
| Hispanic | Data is updating | 1 |
| Two or More Races | 1 | 1 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Chauncey vs Mercer
- The percentage of Black residents is the same in both Chauncey and Mercer at 0%.
- Chauncey has a higher percentage of White residents at 99% compared to 97% in Mercer.
- In Mercer, the Asian population stands at 1%, greater than 0% in Chauncey.
- Mercer has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 1%, compared to 0% in Chauncey.
- Both Chauncey and Mercer have the same percentage of residents identifying as two or more races at 1%.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Chauncey and Mercer at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Chauncey | Mercer |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 19.3% | Data is updating% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 14.2% | Data is updating% |
| Depression | 28.3% | Data is updating% |
| Smoking | 23.1% | Data is updating% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.6% | Data is updating% |
| Obesity | 38.9% | Data is updating% |
| Disability Percentage | 21.0% | Data is updating% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Chauncey vs Mercer
- More residents in Chauncey report poor mental health at 19.3% compared to 0.0% in Mercer.
- Depression is more prevalent in Chauncey at 28.3% compared to 0.0% in Mercer.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Chauncey at 23.1% compared to 0.0% in Mercer.
- Binge drinking is more common in Chauncey at 17.6% compared to 0.0% in Mercer.
- Obesity rates are higher in Chauncey at 38.9% compared to 0.0% in Mercer.
- Disability percentages are higher in Chauncey at 21.0% compared to 0.0% in Mercer.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Chauncey | Mercer |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.5% (14) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 27.6% (262) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| Less than High School | 19.9% (189) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 7.1% (67) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
Education Levels Comparison: Chauncey vs Mercer
- A higher percentage of residents in Chauncey have no formal schooling at 1.5% compared to 0.0% in Mercer.
- A higher percentage of residents in Chauncey hold a high school diploma at 27.6% compared to 0.0% in Mercer.
- More residents in Chauncey have less than a high school education at 19.9% compared to 0.0% in Mercer.
- A higher percentage of residents in Chauncey hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 7.1% compared to 0.0% in Mercer.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.