Demographics details for Chattanooga, TN vs Meriden, CT
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Chattanooga, TN vs Meriden, CT.
Data | Chattanooga | Meriden |
---|---|---|
Population | 184,086 | 60,242 |
Median Age | 37.0 years | 40.2 years |
Median Income | $57,703 | $63,671 |
Married Families | 31.0% | 32.0% |
Poverty Level | 18% | 10% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.0 | 3.2 |
Population Comparison: Chattanooga vs Meriden
- In Chattanooga, the population is higher at 184,086, compared to 60,242 in Meriden.
- The median age in Meriden is higher at 40.2 years, compared to 37.0 years in Chattanooga.
- Meriden has a higher median income of $63,671, compared to $57,703 in Chattanooga.
- In Meriden, the percentage of married families is higher at 32.0%, compared to 31.0% in Chattanooga.
- Chattanooga has a higher poverty level at 18% compared to 10% in Meriden.
- The unemployment rate in Chattanooga is higher at 4.0%, compared to 3.2% in Meriden.
Demographics
Demographics Chattanooga vs Meriden provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Chattanooga | Meriden |
---|---|---|
Black | 29 | 8 |
White | 56 | 38 |
Asian | 2 | 2 |
Hispanic | 7 | 37 |
Two or More Races | 6 | 15 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Chattanooga vs Meriden
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Chattanooga at 29% compared to 8% in Meriden.
- Chattanooga has a higher percentage of White residents at 56% compared to 38% in Meriden.
- Both Chattanooga and Meriden have the same percentage of Asian residents at 2%.
- Meriden has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 37%, compared to 7% in Chattanooga.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Meriden at 15%, compared to 6% in Chattanooga.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Chattanooga and Meriden at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Chattanooga | Meriden |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 18.0% | 15.0% |
Physical Health Not Good | 13.2% | 10.4% |
Depression | 25.9% | 20.9% |
Smoking | 19.5% | 16.8% |
Binge Drinking | 14.5% | 15.6% |
Obesity | 38.1% | 32.5% |
Disability Percentage | 15.0% | 13.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Chattanooga vs Meriden
- More residents in Chattanooga report poor mental health at 18.0% compared to 15.0% in Meriden.
- Depression is more prevalent in Chattanooga at 25.9% compared to 20.9% in Meriden.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Chattanooga at 19.5% compared to 16.8% in Meriden.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Meriden at 15.6% compared to 14.5% in Chattanooga.
- Obesity rates are higher in Chattanooga at 38.1% compared to 32.5% in Meriden.
- Disability percentages are higher in Chattanooga at 15.0% compared to 13.0% in Meriden.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Chattanooga | Meriden |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.9% (1,744) | 1.7% (1,003) |
High School Diploma | 13.9% (25,521) | 21.6% (13,023) |
Less than High School | 11.8% (21,703) | 19.8% (11,930) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 23.4% (43,030) | 13.9% (8,357) |
Education Levels Comparison: Chattanooga vs Meriden
- In Meriden, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.7% compared to 0.9% in Chattanooga.
- In Meriden, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 21.6% compared to 13.9% in Chattanooga.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Meriden at 19.8%, compared to 11.8% in Chattanooga.
- A higher percentage of residents in Chattanooga hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 23.4% compared to 13.9% in Meriden.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.