Demographics details for Chattanooga, TN vs Gouldsboro, PA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Chattanooga, TN vs Gouldsboro, PA.
Data | Chattanooga | Gouldsboro |
---|---|---|
Population | 184,086 | 720 |
Median Age | 37.0 years | 49.8 years |
Median Income | $57,703 | $50,938 |
Married Families | 31.0% | 48.0% |
Poverty Level | 18% | 5% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.0 | 3.2 |
Population Comparison: Chattanooga vs Gouldsboro
- In Chattanooga, the population is higher at 184,086, compared to 720 in Gouldsboro.
- The median age in Gouldsboro is higher at 49.8 years, compared to 37.0 years in Chattanooga.
- Chattanooga has a higher median income of $57,703 compared to $50,938 in Gouldsboro.
- In Gouldsboro, the percentage of married families is higher at 48.0%, compared to 31.0% in Chattanooga.
- Chattanooga has a higher poverty level at 18% compared to 5% in Gouldsboro.
- The unemployment rate in Chattanooga is higher at 4.0%, compared to 3.2% in Gouldsboro.
Demographics
Demographics Chattanooga vs Gouldsboro provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Chattanooga | Gouldsboro |
---|---|---|
Black | 29 | 2 |
White | 56 | 93 |
Asian | 2 | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 7 | 3 |
Two or More Races | 6 | 2 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Chattanooga vs Gouldsboro
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Chattanooga at 29% compared to 2% in Gouldsboro.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Gouldsboro at 93% compared to 56% in Chattanooga.
- The Asian population is larger in Chattanooga at 2% compared to 0% in Gouldsboro.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Chattanooga at 7% compared to 3% in Gouldsboro.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Chattanooga at 6% compared to 2% in Gouldsboro.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Chattanooga and Gouldsboro at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Chattanooga | Gouldsboro |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 18.0% | 16.7% |
Physical Health Not Good | 13.2% | 11.3% |
Depression | 25.9% | 22.7% |
Smoking | 19.5% | 18.7% |
Binge Drinking | 14.5% | 19.2% |
Obesity | 38.1% | 32.8% |
Disability Percentage | 15.0% | 21.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Chattanooga vs Gouldsboro
- More residents in Chattanooga report poor mental health at 18.0% compared to 16.7% in Gouldsboro.
- Depression is more prevalent in Chattanooga at 25.9% compared to 22.7% in Gouldsboro.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Chattanooga at 19.5% compared to 18.7% in Gouldsboro.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Gouldsboro at 19.2% compared to 14.5% in Chattanooga.
- Obesity rates are higher in Chattanooga at 38.1% compared to 32.8% in Gouldsboro.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Gouldsboro at 21.0% compared to 15.0% in Chattanooga.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Chattanooga | Gouldsboro |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.9% (1,744) | 1.4% (10) |
High School Diploma | 13.9% (25,521) | 23.2% (167) |
Less than High School | 11.8% (21,703) | 6.4% (46) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 23.4% (43,030) | 20.8% (150) |
Education Levels Comparison: Chattanooga vs Gouldsboro
- In Gouldsboro, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.4% compared to 0.9% in Chattanooga.
- In Gouldsboro, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 23.2% compared to 13.9% in Chattanooga.
- More residents in Chattanooga have less than a high school education at 11.8% compared to 6.4% in Gouldsboro.
- A higher percentage of residents in Chattanooga hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 23.4% compared to 20.8% in Gouldsboro.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.