Demographics details for Chattanooga, TN vs Fort valley, GA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Chattanooga, TN vs Fort valley, GA.
Data | Chattanooga | Fort valley |
---|---|---|
Population | 184,086 | 8,838 |
Median Age | 37.0 years | 30.6 years |
Median Income | $57,703 | $31,807 |
Married Families | 31.0% | 18.0% |
Poverty Level | 18% | 25% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.0 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: Chattanooga vs Fort valley
- In Chattanooga, the population is higher at 184,086, compared to 8,838 in Fort valley.
- Residents in Chattanooga have a higher median age of 37.0 years compared to 30.6 years in Fort valley.
- Chattanooga has a higher median income of $57,703 compared to $31,807 in Fort valley.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Chattanooga at 31.0% compared to 18.0% in Fort valley.
- The poverty level is higher in Fort valley at 25%, compared to 18% in Chattanooga.
- Fort valley has a higher unemployment rate at 4.5% compared to 4.0% in Chattanooga.
Demographics
Demographics Chattanooga vs Fort valley provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Chattanooga | Fort valley |
---|---|---|
Black | 29 | 70 |
White | 56 | 18 |
Asian | 2 | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 7 | 8 |
Two or More Races | 6 | 4 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Chattanooga vs Fort valley
- In Fort valley, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 70% compared to 29% in Chattanooga.
- Chattanooga has a higher percentage of White residents at 56% compared to 18% in Fort valley.
- The Asian population is larger in Chattanooga at 2% compared to 0% in Fort valley.
- Fort valley has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 8%, compared to 7% in Chattanooga.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Chattanooga at 6% compared to 4% in Fort valley.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Chattanooga and Fort valley at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Chattanooga | Fort valley |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 18.0% | 19.2% |
Physical Health Not Good | 13.2% | 15.5% |
Depression | 25.9% | 19.5% |
Smoking | 19.5% | 22.3% |
Binge Drinking | 14.5% | 11.8% |
Obesity | 38.1% | 46.2% |
Disability Percentage | 15.0% | 16.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Chattanooga vs Fort valley
- In Fort valley, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.2% compared to 18.0% in Chattanooga.
- Depression is more prevalent in Chattanooga at 25.9% compared to 19.5% in Fort valley.
- Fort valley has a higher smoking rate at 22.3% compared to 19.5% in Chattanooga.
- Binge drinking is more common in Chattanooga at 14.5% compared to 11.8% in Fort valley.
- Fort valley has higher obesity rates at 46.2% compared to 38.1% in Chattanooga.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Fort valley at 16.0% compared to 15.0% in Chattanooga.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Chattanooga | Fort valley |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.9% (1,744) | 3.0% (267) |
High School Diploma | 13.9% (25,521) | 13.9% (1,226) |
Less than High School | 11.8% (21,703) | 17.3% (1,527) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 23.4% (43,030) | 10.8% (954) |
Education Levels Comparison: Chattanooga vs Fort valley
- In Fort valley, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 3.0% compared to 0.9% in Chattanooga.
- Both cities have the same percentage of residents with high school diplomas at 13.9%.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Fort valley at 17.3%, compared to 11.8% in Chattanooga.
- A higher percentage of residents in Chattanooga hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 23.4% compared to 10.8% in Fort valley.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.