Demographics details for Charlottesville, VA vs Glenpool, OK

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Charlottesville, VA vs Glenpool, OK.

Data Charlottesville Glenpool
Population 45,373 14,211
Median Age 32.4 years 34.3 years
Median Income $67,177 $75,876
Married Families 30.0% 42.0%
Poverty Level 12% 6%
Unemployment Rate 2.7 3.5

Population Comparison: Charlottesville vs Glenpool

  • In Charlottesville, the population is higher at 45,373, compared to 14,211 in Glenpool.
  • The median age in Glenpool is higher at 34.3 years, compared to 32.4 years in Charlottesville.
  • Glenpool has a higher median income of $75,876, compared to $67,177 in Charlottesville.
  • In Glenpool, the percentage of married families is higher at 42.0%, compared to 30.0% in Charlottesville.
  • Charlottesville has a higher poverty level at 12% compared to 6% in Glenpool.
  • Glenpool has a higher unemployment rate at 3.5% compared to 2.7% in Charlottesville.

Demographics

Demographics Charlottesville vs Glenpool provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Charlottesville Glenpool
Black 18 3
White 63 61
Asian 7 4
Hispanic 6 9
Two or More Races 6 14
American Indian Data is updating 9

Demographics Comparison: Charlottesville vs Glenpool

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Charlottesville at 18% compared to 3% in Glenpool.
  • Charlottesville has a higher percentage of White residents at 63% compared to 61% in Glenpool.
  • The Asian population is larger in Charlottesville at 7% compared to 4% in Glenpool.
  • Glenpool has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 9%, compared to 6% in Charlottesville.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Glenpool at 14%, compared to 6% in Charlottesville.
  • In Glenpool, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 9%, compared to 0% in Charlottesville.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Charlottesville Glenpool
Mental Health Not Good 16.4% 17.8%
Physical Health Not Good 10.5% 11.0%
Depression 22.4% 26.0%
Smoking 15.0% 16.3%
Binge Drinking 16.7% 15.1%
Obesity 32.9% 34.9%
Disability Percentage 9.0% 11.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Charlottesville vs Glenpool

  • In Glenpool, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.8% compared to 16.4% in Charlottesville.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Glenpool at 26.0% versus 22.4% in Charlottesville.
  • Glenpool has a higher smoking rate at 16.3% compared to 15.0% in Charlottesville.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Charlottesville at 16.7% compared to 15.1% in Glenpool.
  • Glenpool has higher obesity rates at 34.9% compared to 32.9% in Charlottesville.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Glenpool at 11.0% compared to 9.0% in Charlottesville.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Charlottesville Glenpool
No Schooling 1.1% (495) 0.7% (96)
High School Diploma 7.8% (3,550) 14.2% (2,018)
Less than High School 7.6% (3,427) 8.9% (1,258)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 38.2% (17,339) 15.4% (2,184)

Education Levels Comparison: Charlottesville vs Glenpool

  • A higher percentage of residents in Charlottesville have no formal schooling at 1.1% compared to 0.7% in Glenpool.
  • In Glenpool, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 14.2% compared to 7.8% in Charlottesville.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Glenpool at 8.9%, compared to 7.6% in Charlottesville.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Charlottesville hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 38.2% compared to 15.4% in Glenpool.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.