Demographics details for Charlottesville, VA vs Flomaton, AL

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Charlottesville, VA vs Flomaton, AL.

Data Charlottesville Flomaton
Population 45,373 1,458
Median Age 32.4 years 32.6 years
Median Income $67,177 $37,500
Married Families 30.0% 35.0%
Poverty Level 12% 15%
Unemployment Rate 2.7 5.2

Population Comparison: Charlottesville vs Flomaton

  • In Charlottesville, the population is higher at 45,373, compared to 1,458 in Flomaton.
  • The median age in Flomaton is higher at 32.6 years, compared to 32.4 years in Charlottesville.
  • Charlottesville has a higher median income of $67,177 compared to $37,500 in Flomaton.
  • In Flomaton, the percentage of married families is higher at 35.0%, compared to 30.0% in Charlottesville.
  • The poverty level is higher in Flomaton at 15%, compared to 12% in Charlottesville.
  • Flomaton has a higher unemployment rate at 5.2% compared to 2.7% in Charlottesville.

Demographics

Demographics Charlottesville vs Flomaton provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Charlottesville Flomaton
Black 18 38
White 63 58
Asian 7 Data is updating
Hispanic 6 Data is updating
Two or More Races 6 4
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Charlottesville vs Flomaton

  • In Flomaton, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 38% compared to 18% in Charlottesville.
  • Charlottesville has a higher percentage of White residents at 63% compared to 58% in Flomaton.
  • The Asian population is larger in Charlottesville at 7% compared to 0% in Flomaton.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Charlottesville at 6% compared to 0% in Flomaton.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Charlottesville at 6% compared to 4% in Flomaton.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Charlottesville and Flomaton at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Charlottesville Flomaton
Mental Health Not Good 16.4% 21.3%
Physical Health Not Good 10.5% 15.3%
Depression 22.4% 24.6%
Smoking 15.0% 24.1%
Binge Drinking 16.7% 13.7%
Obesity 32.9% 45.3%
Disability Percentage 9.0% 19.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Charlottesville vs Flomaton

  • In Flomaton, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 21.3% compared to 16.4% in Charlottesville.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Flomaton at 24.6% versus 22.4% in Charlottesville.
  • Flomaton has a higher smoking rate at 24.1% compared to 15.0% in Charlottesville.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Charlottesville at 16.7% compared to 13.7% in Flomaton.
  • Flomaton has higher obesity rates at 45.3% compared to 32.9% in Charlottesville.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Flomaton at 19.0% compared to 9.0% in Charlottesville.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Charlottesville Flomaton
No Schooling 1.1% (495) 0.0% (Data is updating)
High School Diploma 7.8% (3,550) 25.0% (364)
Less than High School 7.6% (3,427) 19.1% (278)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 38.2% (17,339) 9.4% (137)

Education Levels Comparison: Charlottesville vs Flomaton

  • A higher percentage of residents in Charlottesville have no formal schooling at 1.1% compared to 0.0% in Flomaton.
  • In Flomaton, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 25.0% compared to 7.8% in Charlottesville.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Flomaton at 19.1%, compared to 7.6% in Charlottesville.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Charlottesville hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 38.2% compared to 9.4% in Flomaton.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.