Demographics details for Charlotte, TN vs Stoughton, MA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Charlotte, TN vs Stoughton, MA.
Data | Charlotte | Stoughton |
---|---|---|
Population | 1,674 | 28,950 |
Median Age | 36.8 years | 40.0 years |
Median Income | $57,188 | $86,000 |
Married Families | 46.0% | 54.0% |
Poverty Level | 14% | 5% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.3 | 3.7 |
Population Comparison: Charlotte vs Stoughton
- The population in Stoughton is higher at 28,950, compared to 1,674 in Charlotte.
- The median age in Stoughton is higher at 40.0 years, compared to 36.8 years in Charlotte.
- Stoughton has a higher median income of $86,000, compared to $57,188 in Charlotte.
- In Stoughton, the percentage of married families is higher at 54.0%, compared to 46.0% in Charlotte.
- Charlotte has a higher poverty level at 14% compared to 5% in Stoughton.
- The unemployment rate in Charlotte is higher at 4.3%, compared to 3.7% in Stoughton.
Demographics
Demographics Charlotte vs Stoughton provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Charlotte | Stoughton |
---|---|---|
Black | 6 | 7 |
White | 82 | 72 |
Asian | Data is updating | 5 |
Hispanic | 4 | 12 |
Two or More Races | 6 | 4 |
American Indian | 2 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Charlotte vs Stoughton
- In Stoughton, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 7% compared to 6% in Charlotte.
- Charlotte has a higher percentage of White residents at 82% compared to 72% in Stoughton.
- In Stoughton, the Asian population stands at 5%, greater than 0% in Charlotte.
- Stoughton has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 12%, compared to 4% in Charlotte.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Charlotte at 6% compared to 4% in Stoughton.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Charlotte at 2% compared to 0% in Stoughton.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Charlotte | Stoughton |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 20.3% | Data is updating% |
Physical Health Not Good | 14.7% | Data is updating% |
Depression | 28.8% | Data is updating% |
Smoking | 25.3% | Data is updating% |
Binge Drinking | 16.0% | Data is updating% |
Obesity | 38.9% | Data is updating% |
Disability Percentage | 27.0% | Data is updating% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Charlotte vs Stoughton
- More residents in Charlotte report poor mental health at 20.3% compared to 0.0% in Stoughton.
- Depression is more prevalent in Charlotte at 28.8% compared to 0.0% in Stoughton.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Charlotte at 25.3% compared to 0.0% in Stoughton.
- Binge drinking is more common in Charlotte at 16.0% compared to 0.0% in Stoughton.
- Obesity rates are higher in Charlotte at 38.9% compared to 0.0% in Stoughton.
- Disability percentages are higher in Charlotte at 27.0% compared to 0.0% in Stoughton.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Charlotte | Stoughton |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.4% (6) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
High School Diploma | 25.3% (424) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
Less than High School | 26.0% (436) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 9.9% (166) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
Education Levels Comparison: Charlotte vs Stoughton
- A higher percentage of residents in Charlotte have no formal schooling at 0.4% compared to 0.0% in Stoughton.
- A higher percentage of residents in Charlotte hold a high school diploma at 25.3% compared to 0.0% in Stoughton.
- More residents in Charlotte have less than a high school education at 26.0% compared to 0.0% in Stoughton.
- A higher percentage of residents in Charlotte hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 9.9% compared to 0.0% in Stoughton.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.