Demographics details for Charlotte, TN vs Lancaster, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Charlotte, TN vs Lancaster, CA.
| Data | Charlotte | Lancaster |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 1,674 | 169,185 |
| Median Age | 36.8 years | 33.6 years |
| Median Income | $57,188 | $71,367 |
| Married Families | 46.0% | 32.0% |
| Poverty Level | 14% | 15% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.3 | 8.2 |
Population Comparison: Charlotte vs Lancaster
- The population in Lancaster is higher at 169,185, compared to 1,674 in Charlotte.
- Residents in Charlotte have a higher median age of 36.8 years compared to 33.6 years in Lancaster.
- Lancaster has a higher median income of $71,367, compared to $57,188 in Charlotte.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Charlotte at 46.0% compared to 32.0% in Lancaster.
- The poverty level is higher in Lancaster at 15%, compared to 14% in Charlotte.
- Lancaster has a higher unemployment rate at 8.2% compared to 4.3% in Charlotte.
Demographics
Demographics Charlotte vs Lancaster provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Charlotte | Lancaster |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 6 | 21 |
| White | 82 | 10 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 4 |
| Hispanic | 4 | 46 |
| Two or More Races | 6 | 18 |
| American Indian | 2 | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Charlotte vs Lancaster
- In Lancaster, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 21% compared to 6% in Charlotte.
- Charlotte has a higher percentage of White residents at 82% compared to 10% in Lancaster.
- In Lancaster, the Asian population stands at 4%, greater than 0% in Charlotte.
- Lancaster has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 46%, compared to 4% in Charlotte.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Lancaster at 18%, compared to 6% in Charlotte.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Charlotte at 2% compared to 1% in Lancaster.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Charlotte | Lancaster |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 20.3% | 17.8% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 14.7% | 13.5% |
| Depression | 28.8% | 17.7% |
| Smoking | 25.3% | 14.8% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.0% | 15.1% |
| Obesity | 38.9% | 32.9% |
| Disability Percentage | 27.0% | 10.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Charlotte vs Lancaster
- More residents in Charlotte report poor mental health at 20.3% compared to 17.8% in Lancaster.
- Depression is more prevalent in Charlotte at 28.8% compared to 17.7% in Lancaster.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Charlotte at 25.3% compared to 14.8% in Lancaster.
- Binge drinking is more common in Charlotte at 16.0% compared to 15.1% in Lancaster.
- Obesity rates are higher in Charlotte at 38.9% compared to 32.9% in Lancaster.
- Disability percentages are higher in Charlotte at 27.0% compared to 10.0% in Lancaster.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Charlotte | Lancaster |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.4% (6) | 2.0% (3,403) |
| High School Diploma | 25.3% (424) | 17.5% (29,555) |
| Less than High School | 26.0% (436) | 21.5% (36,421) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 9.9% (166) | 12.3% (20,861) |
Education Levels Comparison: Charlotte vs Lancaster
- In Lancaster, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.0% compared to 0.4% in Charlotte.
- A higher percentage of residents in Charlotte hold a high school diploma at 25.3% compared to 17.5% in Lancaster.
- More residents in Charlotte have less than a high school education at 26.0% compared to 21.5% in Lancaster.
- In Lancaster, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 12.3% compared to 9.9% in Charlotte.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.