Demographics details for Charlotte, TN vs Dryden, VA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Charlotte, TN vs Dryden, VA.
| Data | Charlotte | Dryden |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 1,674 | 684 |
| Median Age | 36.8 years | 38.2 years |
| Median Income | $57,188 | $52,054 |
| Married Families | 46.0% | 30.0% |
| Poverty Level | 14% | 10% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.3 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: Charlotte vs Dryden
- In Charlotte, the population is higher at 1,674, compared to 684 in Dryden.
- The median age in Dryden is higher at 38.2 years, compared to 36.8 years in Charlotte.
- Charlotte has a higher median income of $57,188 compared to $52,054 in Dryden.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Charlotte at 46.0% compared to 30.0% in Dryden.
- Charlotte has a higher poverty level at 14% compared to 10% in Dryden.
- Dryden has a higher unemployment rate at 4.5% compared to 4.3% in Charlotte.
Demographics
Demographics Charlotte vs Dryden provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Charlotte | Dryden |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 6 | Data is updating |
| White | 82 | 99 |
| Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 4 | 1 |
| Two or More Races | 6 | Data is updating |
| American Indian | 2 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Charlotte vs Dryden
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Charlotte at 6% compared to 0% in Dryden.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Dryden at 99% compared to 82% in Charlotte.
- Both Charlotte and Dryden have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Charlotte at 4% compared to 1% in Dryden.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Charlotte at 6% compared to 0% in Dryden.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Charlotte at 2% compared to 0% in Dryden.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Charlotte | Dryden |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 20.3% | 20.1% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 14.7% | 14.4% |
| Depression | 28.8% | 27.8% |
| Smoking | 25.3% | 23.5% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.0% | 16.9% |
| Obesity | 38.9% | 40.6% |
| Disability Percentage | 27.0% | 21.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Charlotte vs Dryden
- More residents in Charlotte report poor mental health at 20.3% compared to 20.1% in Dryden.
- Depression is more prevalent in Charlotte at 28.8% compared to 27.8% in Dryden.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Charlotte at 25.3% compared to 23.5% in Dryden.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Dryden at 16.9% compared to 16.0% in Charlotte.
- Dryden has higher obesity rates at 40.6% compared to 38.9% in Charlotte.
- Disability percentages are higher in Charlotte at 27.0% compared to 21.0% in Dryden.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Charlotte | Dryden |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.4% (6) | 3.5% (24) |
| High School Diploma | 25.3% (424) | 14.2% (97) |
| Less than High School | 26.0% (436) | 13.5% (92) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 9.9% (166) | 11.5% (79) |
Education Levels Comparison: Charlotte vs Dryden
- In Dryden, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 3.5% compared to 0.4% in Charlotte.
- A higher percentage of residents in Charlotte hold a high school diploma at 25.3% compared to 14.2% in Dryden.
- More residents in Charlotte have less than a high school education at 26.0% compared to 13.5% in Dryden.
- In Dryden, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 11.5% compared to 9.9% in Charlotte.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.