Demographics details for Charlotte, TN vs Copperas cove, TX
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Charlotte, TN vs Copperas cove, TX.
Data | Charlotte | Copperas cove |
---|---|---|
Population | 1,674 | 37,964 |
Median Age | 36.8 years | 31.7 years |
Median Income | $57,188 | $64,798 |
Married Families | 46.0% | 38.0% |
Poverty Level | 14% | 11% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.3 | 4.8 |
Population Comparison: Charlotte vs Copperas cove
- The population in Copperas cove is higher at 37,964, compared to 1,674 in Charlotte.
- Residents in Charlotte have a higher median age of 36.8 years compared to 31.7 years in Copperas cove.
- Copperas cove has a higher median income of $64,798, compared to $57,188 in Charlotte.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Charlotte at 46.0% compared to 38.0% in Copperas cove.
- Charlotte has a higher poverty level at 14% compared to 11% in Copperas cove.
- Copperas cove has a higher unemployment rate at 4.8% compared to 4.3% in Charlotte.
Demographics
Demographics Charlotte vs Copperas cove provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Charlotte | Copperas cove |
---|---|---|
Black | 6 | 15 |
White | 82 | 47 |
Asian | Data is updating | 2 |
Hispanic | 4 | 19 |
Two or More Races | 6 | 17 |
American Indian | 2 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Charlotte vs Copperas cove
- In Copperas cove, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 15% compared to 6% in Charlotte.
- Charlotte has a higher percentage of White residents at 82% compared to 47% in Copperas cove.
- In Copperas cove, the Asian population stands at 2%, greater than 0% in Charlotte.
- Copperas cove has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 19%, compared to 4% in Charlotte.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Copperas cove at 17%, compared to 6% in Charlotte.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Charlotte at 2% compared to 0% in Copperas cove.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Charlotte | Copperas cove |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 20.3% | 17.6% |
Physical Health Not Good | 14.7% | 12.0% |
Depression | 28.8% | 24.9% |
Smoking | 25.3% | 18.3% |
Binge Drinking | 16.0% | 17.8% |
Obesity | 38.9% | 41.6% |
Disability Percentage | 27.0% | 16.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Charlotte vs Copperas cove
- More residents in Charlotte report poor mental health at 20.3% compared to 17.6% in Copperas cove.
- Depression is more prevalent in Charlotte at 28.8% compared to 24.9% in Copperas cove.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Charlotte at 25.3% compared to 18.3% in Copperas cove.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Copperas cove at 17.8% compared to 16.0% in Charlotte.
- Copperas cove has higher obesity rates at 41.6% compared to 38.9% in Charlotte.
- Disability percentages are higher in Charlotte at 27.0% compared to 16.0% in Copperas cove.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Charlotte | Copperas cove |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.4% (6) | 0.5% (200) |
High School Diploma | 25.3% (424) | 12.8% (4,867) |
Less than High School | 26.0% (436) | 6.8% (2,567) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 9.9% (166) | 12.5% (4,756) |
Education Levels Comparison: Charlotte vs Copperas cove
- In Copperas cove, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.5% compared to 0.4% in Charlotte.
- A higher percentage of residents in Charlotte hold a high school diploma at 25.3% compared to 12.8% in Copperas cove.
- More residents in Charlotte have less than a high school education at 26.0% compared to 6.8% in Copperas cove.
- In Copperas cove, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 12.5% compared to 9.9% in Charlotte.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.