Demographics details for Charlotte, NC vs Shafter, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Charlotte, NC vs Shafter, CA.
| Data | Charlotte | Shafter |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 897,720 | 21,282 |
| Median Age | 34.5 years | 27.4 years |
| Median Income | $74,070 | $66,418 |
| Married Families | 33.0% | 31.0% |
| Poverty Level | 12% | 20% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.0 | 5.1 |
Population Comparison: Charlotte vs Shafter
- In Charlotte, the population is higher at 897,720, compared to 21,282 in Shafter.
- Residents in Charlotte have a higher median age of 34.5 years compared to 27.4 years in Shafter.
- Charlotte has a higher median income of $74,070 compared to $66,418 in Shafter.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Charlotte at 33.0% compared to 31.0% in Shafter.
- The poverty level is higher in Shafter at 20%, compared to 12% in Charlotte.
- Shafter has a higher unemployment rate at 5.1% compared to 4.0% in Charlotte.
Demographics
Demographics Charlotte vs Shafter provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Charlotte | Shafter |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 34 | 2 |
| White | 38 | -9 |
| Asian | 6 | 1 |
| Hispanic | 15 | 78 |
| Two or More Races | 7 | 27 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Charlotte vs Shafter
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Charlotte at 34% compared to 2% in Shafter.
- Charlotte has a higher percentage of White residents at 38% compared to -9% in Shafter.
- The Asian population is larger in Charlotte at 6% compared to 1% in Shafter.
- Shafter has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 78%, compared to 15% in Charlotte.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Shafter at 27%, compared to 7% in Charlotte.
- In Shafter, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Charlotte.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Charlotte | Shafter |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 14.7% | 18.8% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.1% | 16.6% |
| Depression | 20.1% | 19.7% |
| Smoking | 13.9% | 18.3% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.5% | 14.9% |
| Obesity | 34.7% | 39.4% |
| Disability Percentage | 8.0% | 6.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Charlotte vs Shafter
- In Shafter, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.8% compared to 14.7% in Charlotte.
- Depression is more prevalent in Charlotte at 20.1% compared to 19.7% in Shafter.
- Shafter has a higher smoking rate at 18.3% compared to 13.9% in Charlotte.
- Binge drinking is more common in Charlotte at 17.5% compared to 14.9% in Shafter.
- Shafter has higher obesity rates at 39.4% compared to 34.7% in Charlotte.
- Disability percentages are higher in Charlotte at 8.0% compared to 6.0% in Shafter.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Charlotte | Shafter |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.2% (10,429) | 2.7% (567) |
| High School Diploma | 9.4% (84,002) | 14.1% (2,992) |
| Less than High School | 10.7% (95,990) | 32.9% (6,999) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 30.6% (274,311) | 5.7% (1,217) |
Education Levels Comparison: Charlotte vs Shafter
- In Shafter, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.7% compared to 1.2% in Charlotte.
- In Shafter, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 14.1% compared to 9.4% in Charlotte.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Shafter at 32.9%, compared to 10.7% in Charlotte.
- A higher percentage of residents in Charlotte hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 30.6% compared to 5.7% in Shafter.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.