Demographics details for Charlotte, NC vs Farmington, NM
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Charlotte, NC vs Farmington, NM.
| Data | Charlotte | Farmington |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 897,720 | 46,127 |
| Median Age | 34.5 years | 35.7 years |
| Median Income | $74,070 | $61,388 |
| Married Families | 33.0% | 34.0% |
| Poverty Level | 12% | 10% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.0 | 5.2 |
Population Comparison: Charlotte vs Farmington
- In Charlotte, the population is higher at 897,720, compared to 46,127 in Farmington.
- The median age in Farmington is higher at 35.7 years, compared to 34.5 years in Charlotte.
- Charlotte has a higher median income of $74,070 compared to $61,388 in Farmington.
- In Farmington, the percentage of married families is higher at 34.0%, compared to 33.0% in Charlotte.
- Charlotte has a higher poverty level at 12% compared to 10% in Farmington.
- Farmington has a higher unemployment rate at 5.2% compared to 4.0% in Charlotte.
Demographics
Demographics Charlotte vs Farmington provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Charlotte | Farmington |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 34 | 1 |
| White | 38 | 32 |
| Asian | 6 | 1 |
| Hispanic | 15 | 26 |
| Two or More Races | 7 | 11 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 29 |
Demographics Comparison: Charlotte vs Farmington
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Charlotte at 34% compared to 1% in Farmington.
- Charlotte has a higher percentage of White residents at 38% compared to 32% in Farmington.
- The Asian population is larger in Charlotte at 6% compared to 1% in Farmington.
- Farmington has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 26%, compared to 15% in Charlotte.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Farmington at 11%, compared to 7% in Charlotte.
- In Farmington, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 29%, compared to 0% in Charlotte.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Charlotte | Farmington |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 14.7% | 17.6% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.1% | 12.7% |
| Depression | 20.1% | 20.1% |
| Smoking | 13.9% | 18.2% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.5% | 13.5% |
| Obesity | 34.7% | 34.4% |
| Disability Percentage | 8.0% | 14.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Charlotte vs Farmington
- In Farmington, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.6% compared to 14.7% in Charlotte.
- Both cities have comparable depression rates at 20.1%.
- Farmington has a higher smoking rate at 18.2% compared to 13.9% in Charlotte.
- Binge drinking is more common in Charlotte at 17.5% compared to 13.5% in Farmington.
- Obesity rates are higher in Charlotte at 34.7% compared to 34.4% in Farmington.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Farmington at 14.0% compared to 8.0% in Charlotte.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Charlotte | Farmington |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.2% (10,429) | 0.5% (211) |
| High School Diploma | 9.4% (84,002) | 13.4% (6,180) |
| Less than High School | 10.7% (95,990) | 12.9% (5,929) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 30.6% (274,311) | 13.0% (5,985) |
Education Levels Comparison: Charlotte vs Farmington
- A higher percentage of residents in Charlotte have no formal schooling at 1.2% compared to 0.5% in Farmington.
- In Farmington, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 13.4% compared to 9.4% in Charlotte.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Farmington at 12.9%, compared to 10.7% in Charlotte.
- A higher percentage of residents in Charlotte hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 30.6% compared to 13.0% in Farmington.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.