Demographics details for Charlotte, NC vs Fairburn, GA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Charlotte, NC vs Fairburn, GA.
| Data | Charlotte | Fairburn |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 897,720 | 16,956 |
| Median Age | 34.5 years | 30.9 years |
| Median Income | $74,070 | $67,245 |
| Married Families | 33.0% | 20.0% |
| Poverty Level | 12% | 15% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.0 | 4.2 |
Population Comparison: Charlotte vs Fairburn
- In Charlotte, the population is higher at 897,720, compared to 16,956 in Fairburn.
- Residents in Charlotte have a higher median age of 34.5 years compared to 30.9 years in Fairburn.
- Charlotte has a higher median income of $74,070 compared to $67,245 in Fairburn.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Charlotte at 33.0% compared to 20.0% in Fairburn.
- The poverty level is higher in Fairburn at 15%, compared to 12% in Charlotte.
- Fairburn has a higher unemployment rate at 4.2% compared to 4.0% in Charlotte.
Demographics
Demographics Charlotte vs Fairburn provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Charlotte | Fairburn |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 34 | 73 |
| White | 38 | 12 |
| Asian | 6 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 15 | 12 |
| Two or More Races | 7 | 3 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Charlotte vs Fairburn
- In Fairburn, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 73% compared to 34% in Charlotte.
- Charlotte has a higher percentage of White residents at 38% compared to 12% in Fairburn.
- The Asian population is larger in Charlotte at 6% compared to 0% in Fairburn.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Charlotte at 15% compared to 12% in Fairburn.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Charlotte at 7% compared to 3% in Fairburn.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Charlotte and Fairburn at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Charlotte | Fairburn |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 14.7% | 15.4% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.1% | 10.9% |
| Depression | 20.1% | 16.8% |
| Smoking | 13.9% | 15.6% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.5% | 15.0% |
| Obesity | 34.7% | 33.7% |
| Disability Percentage | 8.0% | 7.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Charlotte vs Fairburn
- In Fairburn, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 15.4% compared to 14.7% in Charlotte.
- Depression is more prevalent in Charlotte at 20.1% compared to 16.8% in Fairburn.
- Fairburn has a higher smoking rate at 15.6% compared to 13.9% in Charlotte.
- Binge drinking is more common in Charlotte at 17.5% compared to 15.0% in Fairburn.
- Obesity rates are higher in Charlotte at 34.7% compared to 33.7% in Fairburn.
- Disability percentages are higher in Charlotte at 8.0% compared to 7.0% in Fairburn.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Charlotte | Fairburn |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.2% (10,429) | 0.5% (78) |
| High School Diploma | 9.4% (84,002) | 12.3% (2,082) |
| Less than High School | 10.7% (95,990) | 5.7% (961) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 30.6% (274,311) | 21.2% (3,591) |
Education Levels Comparison: Charlotte vs Fairburn
- A higher percentage of residents in Charlotte have no formal schooling at 1.2% compared to 0.5% in Fairburn.
- In Fairburn, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 12.3% compared to 9.4% in Charlotte.
- More residents in Charlotte have less than a high school education at 10.7% compared to 5.7% in Fairburn.
- A higher percentage of residents in Charlotte hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 30.6% compared to 21.2% in Fairburn.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.