Demographics details for Charlotte, NC vs Crawford, NE
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Charlotte, NC vs Crawford, NE.
| Data | Charlotte | Crawford |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 897,720 | 838 |
| Median Age | 34.5 years | 52.1 years |
| Median Income | $74,070 | $54,167 |
| Married Families | 33.0% | 60.0% |
| Poverty Level | 12% | 10% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.0 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Charlotte vs Crawford
- In Charlotte, the population is higher at 897,720, compared to 838 in Crawford.
- The median age in Crawford is higher at 52.1 years, compared to 34.5 years in Charlotte.
- Charlotte has a higher median income of $74,070 compared to $54,167 in Crawford.
- In Crawford, the percentage of married families is higher at 60.0%, compared to 33.0% in Charlotte.
- Charlotte has a higher poverty level at 12% compared to 10% in Crawford.
- The unemployment rate in Charlotte is higher at 4.0%, compared to 3.5% in Crawford.
Demographics
Demographics Charlotte vs Crawford provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Charlotte | Crawford |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 34 | Data is updating |
| White | 38 | 76 |
| Asian | 6 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 15 | 15 |
| Two or More Races | 7 | 3 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 6 |
Demographics Comparison: Charlotte vs Crawford
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Charlotte at 34% compared to 0% in Crawford.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Crawford at 76% compared to 38% in Charlotte.
- The Asian population is larger in Charlotte at 6% compared to 0% in Crawford.
- The percentage of Hispanic residents is the same in both Charlotte and Crawford at 15%.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Charlotte at 7% compared to 3% in Crawford.
- In Crawford, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 6%, compared to 0% in Charlotte.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Charlotte | Crawford |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 14.7% | 13.8% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.1% | 9.4% |
| Depression | 20.1% | 18.9% |
| Smoking | 13.9% | 15.7% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.5% | 20.0% |
| Obesity | 34.7% | 40.3% |
| Disability Percentage | 8.0% | 14.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Charlotte vs Crawford
- More residents in Charlotte report poor mental health at 14.7% compared to 13.8% in Crawford.
- Depression is more prevalent in Charlotte at 20.1% compared to 18.9% in Crawford.
- Crawford has a higher smoking rate at 15.7% compared to 13.9% in Charlotte.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Crawford at 20.0% compared to 17.5% in Charlotte.
- Crawford has higher obesity rates at 40.3% compared to 34.7% in Charlotte.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Crawford at 14.0% compared to 8.0% in Charlotte.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Charlotte | Crawford |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.2% (10,429) | 0.6% (5) |
| High School Diploma | 9.4% (84,002) | 30.2% (253) |
| Less than High School | 10.7% (95,990) | 6.0% (50) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 30.6% (274,311) | 17.1% (143) |
Education Levels Comparison: Charlotte vs Crawford
- A higher percentage of residents in Charlotte have no formal schooling at 1.2% compared to 0.6% in Crawford.
- In Crawford, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 30.2% compared to 9.4% in Charlotte.
- More residents in Charlotte have less than a high school education at 10.7% compared to 6.0% in Crawford.
- A higher percentage of residents in Charlotte hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 30.6% compared to 17.1% in Crawford.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.