Demographics details for Charlotte, NC vs College place, WA

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Charlotte, NC vs College place, WA.

Data Charlotte College place
Population 897,720 9,804
Median Age 34.5 years 32.2 years
Median Income $74,070 $60,417
Married Families 33.0% 37.0%
Poverty Level 12% 10%
Unemployment Rate 4.0 5.1

Population Comparison: Charlotte vs College place

  • In Charlotte, the population is higher at 897,720, compared to 9,804 in College place.
  • Residents in Charlotte have a higher median age of 34.5 years compared to 32.2 years in College place.
  • Charlotte has a higher median income of $74,070 compared to $60,417 in College place.
  • In College place, the percentage of married families is higher at 37.0%, compared to 33.0% in Charlotte.
  • Charlotte has a higher poverty level at 12% compared to 10% in College place.
  • College place has a higher unemployment rate at 5.1% compared to 4.0% in Charlotte.

Demographics

Demographics Charlotte vs College place provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Charlotte College place
Black 34 Data is updating
White 38 72
Asian 6 2
Hispanic 15 18
Two or More Races 7 8
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Charlotte vs College place

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Charlotte at 34% compared to 0% in College place.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in College place at 72% compared to 38% in Charlotte.
  • The Asian population is larger in Charlotte at 6% compared to 2% in College place.
  • College place has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 18%, compared to 15% in Charlotte.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in College place at 8%, compared to 7% in Charlotte.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Charlotte and College place at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Charlotte College place
Mental Health Not Good 14.7% 16.9%
Physical Health Not Good 10.1% 10.9%
Depression 20.1% 26.6%
Smoking 13.9% 12.8%
Binge Drinking 17.5% 17.6%
Obesity 34.7% 32.7%
Disability Percentage 8.0% 14.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Charlotte vs College place

  • In College place, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 16.9% compared to 14.7% in Charlotte.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in College place at 26.6% versus 20.1% in Charlotte.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Charlotte at 13.9% compared to 12.8% in College place.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in College place at 17.6% compared to 17.5% in Charlotte.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Charlotte at 34.7% compared to 32.7% in College place.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in College place at 14.0% compared to 8.0% in Charlotte.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Charlotte College place
No Schooling 1.2% (10,429) 0.1% (14)
High School Diploma 9.4% (84,002) 8.6% (847)
Less than High School 10.7% (95,990) 13.2% (1,295)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 30.6% (274,311) 22.7% (2,224)

Education Levels Comparison: Charlotte vs College place

  • A higher percentage of residents in Charlotte have no formal schooling at 1.2% compared to 0.1% in College place.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Charlotte hold a high school diploma at 9.4% compared to 8.6% in College place.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in College place at 13.2%, compared to 10.7% in Charlotte.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Charlotte hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 30.6% compared to 22.7% in College place.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.