Demographics details for Charlotte, NC vs Beaverton, MI
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Charlotte, NC vs Beaverton, MI.
Data | Charlotte | Beaverton |
---|---|---|
Population | 897,720 | 1,156 |
Median Age | 34.5 years | 39.6 years |
Median Income | $74,070 | $31,985 |
Married Families | 33.0% | 30.0% |
Poverty Level | 12% | 12% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.0 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: Charlotte vs Beaverton
- In Charlotte, the population is higher at 897,720, compared to 1,156 in Beaverton.
- The median age in Beaverton is higher at 39.6 years, compared to 34.5 years in Charlotte.
- Charlotte has a higher median income of $74,070 compared to $31,985 in Beaverton.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Charlotte at 33.0% compared to 30.0% in Beaverton.
- The poverty level is identical in both Charlotte and Beaverton at 12%.
- Beaverton has a higher unemployment rate at 4.5% compared to 4.0% in Charlotte.
Demographics
Demographics Charlotte vs Beaverton provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Charlotte | Beaverton |
---|---|---|
Black | 34 | 1 |
White | 38 | 93 |
Asian | 6 | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 15 | 1 |
Two or More Races | 7 | 5 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Charlotte vs Beaverton
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Charlotte at 34% compared to 1% in Beaverton.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Beaverton at 93% compared to 38% in Charlotte.
- The Asian population is larger in Charlotte at 6% compared to 0% in Beaverton.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Charlotte at 15% compared to 1% in Beaverton.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Charlotte at 7% compared to 5% in Beaverton.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Charlotte and Beaverton at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Charlotte | Beaverton |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 14.7% | 20.4% |
Physical Health Not Good | 10.1% | 13.9% |
Depression | 20.1% | 28.3% |
Smoking | 13.9% | 24.8% |
Binge Drinking | 17.5% | 18.0% |
Obesity | 34.7% | 39.3% |
Disability Percentage | 8.0% | 27.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Charlotte vs Beaverton
- In Beaverton, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 20.4% compared to 14.7% in Charlotte.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Beaverton at 28.3% versus 20.1% in Charlotte.
- Beaverton has a higher smoking rate at 24.8% compared to 13.9% in Charlotte.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Beaverton at 18.0% compared to 17.5% in Charlotte.
- Beaverton has higher obesity rates at 39.3% compared to 34.7% in Charlotte.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Beaverton at 27.0% compared to 8.0% in Charlotte.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Charlotte | Beaverton |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 1.2% (10,429) | 1.0% (11) |
High School Diploma | 9.4% (84,002) | 25.3% (293) |
Less than High School | 10.7% (95,990) | 14.0% (162) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 30.6% (274,311) | 8.0% (93) |
Education Levels Comparison: Charlotte vs Beaverton
- A higher percentage of residents in Charlotte have no formal schooling at 1.2% compared to 1.0% in Beaverton.
- In Beaverton, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 25.3% compared to 9.4% in Charlotte.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Beaverton at 14.0%, compared to 10.7% in Charlotte.
- A higher percentage of residents in Charlotte hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 30.6% compared to 8.0% in Beaverton.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.