Demographics details for Charlotte, NC vs Aberdeen, MS
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Charlotte, NC vs Aberdeen, MS.
| Data | Charlotte | Aberdeen |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 897,720 | 4,848 |
| Median Age | 34.5 years | 41.5 years |
| Median Income | $74,070 | $46,788 |
| Married Families | 33.0% | 30.0% |
| Poverty Level | 12% | 22% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.0 | 4.4 |
Population Comparison: Charlotte vs Aberdeen
- In Charlotte, the population is higher at 897,720, compared to 4,848 in Aberdeen.
- The median age in Aberdeen is higher at 41.5 years, compared to 34.5 years in Charlotte.
- Charlotte has a higher median income of $74,070 compared to $46,788 in Aberdeen.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Charlotte at 33.0% compared to 30.0% in Aberdeen.
- The poverty level is higher in Aberdeen at 22%, compared to 12% in Charlotte.
- Aberdeen has a higher unemployment rate at 4.4% compared to 4.0% in Charlotte.
Demographics
Demographics Charlotte vs Aberdeen provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Charlotte | Aberdeen |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 34 | 76 |
| White | 38 | 24 |
| Asian | 6 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 15 | Data is updating |
| Two or More Races | 7 | Data is updating |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Charlotte vs Aberdeen
- In Aberdeen, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 76% compared to 34% in Charlotte.
- Charlotte has a higher percentage of White residents at 38% compared to 24% in Aberdeen.
- The Asian population is larger in Charlotte at 6% compared to 0% in Aberdeen.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Charlotte at 15% compared to 0% in Aberdeen.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Charlotte at 7% compared to 0% in Aberdeen.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Charlotte and Aberdeen at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Charlotte | Aberdeen |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 14.7% | 18.4% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.1% | 14.4% |
| Depression | 20.1% | 20.7% |
| Smoking | 13.9% | 23.1% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.5% | 11.8% |
| Obesity | 34.7% | 44.0% |
| Disability Percentage | 8.0% | 14.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Charlotte vs Aberdeen
- In Aberdeen, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.4% compared to 14.7% in Charlotte.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Aberdeen at 20.7% versus 20.1% in Charlotte.
- Aberdeen has a higher smoking rate at 23.1% compared to 13.9% in Charlotte.
- Binge drinking is more common in Charlotte at 17.5% compared to 11.8% in Aberdeen.
- Aberdeen has higher obesity rates at 44.0% compared to 34.7% in Charlotte.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Aberdeen at 14.0% compared to 8.0% in Charlotte.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Charlotte | Aberdeen |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.2% (10,429) | 0.3% (16) |
| High School Diploma | 9.4% (84,002) | 27.7% (1,341) |
| Less than High School | 10.7% (95,990) | 17.0% (822) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 30.6% (274,311) | 8.7% (424) |
Education Levels Comparison: Charlotte vs Aberdeen
- A higher percentage of residents in Charlotte have no formal schooling at 1.2% compared to 0.3% in Aberdeen.
- In Aberdeen, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 27.7% compared to 9.4% in Charlotte.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Aberdeen at 17.0%, compared to 10.7% in Charlotte.
- A higher percentage of residents in Charlotte hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 30.6% compared to 8.7% in Aberdeen.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.