Demographics details for Charleston, SC vs Roaring spring, PA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Charleston, SC vs Roaring spring, PA.
Data | Charleston | Roaring spring |
---|---|---|
Population | 153,672 | 2,333 |
Median Age | 36.3 years | 36.1 years |
Median Income | $83,891 | $63,194 |
Married Families | 37.0% | 43.0% |
Poverty Level | 12% | 10% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.8 | 5.0 |
Population Comparison: Charleston vs Roaring spring
- In Charleston, the population is higher at 153,672, compared to 2,333 in Roaring spring.
- Residents in Charleston have a higher median age of 36.3 years compared to 36.1 years in Roaring spring.
- Charleston has a higher median income of $83,891 compared to $63,194 in Roaring spring.
- In Roaring spring, the percentage of married families is higher at 43.0%, compared to 37.0% in Charleston.
- Charleston has a higher poverty level at 12% compared to 10% in Roaring spring.
- Roaring spring has a higher unemployment rate at 5.0% compared to 3.8% in Charleston.
Demographics
Demographics Charleston vs Roaring spring provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Charleston | Roaring spring |
---|---|---|
Black | 18 | 1 |
White | 71 | 91 |
Asian | 2 | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 5 | 3 |
Two or More Races | 4 | 5 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Charleston vs Roaring spring
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Charleston at 18% compared to 1% in Roaring spring.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Roaring spring at 91% compared to 71% in Charleston.
- The Asian population is larger in Charleston at 2% compared to 0% in Roaring spring.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Charleston at 5% compared to 3% in Roaring spring.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Roaring spring at 5%, compared to 4% in Charleston.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Charleston and Roaring spring at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Charleston | Roaring spring |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 15.6% | 18.2% |
Physical Health Not Good | 9.4% | 12.2% |
Depression | 19.6% | 25.5% |
Smoking | 13.0% | 21.4% |
Binge Drinking | 23.0% | 18.5% |
Obesity | 31.8% | 34.7% |
Disability Percentage | 9.0% | 14.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Charleston vs Roaring spring
- In Roaring spring, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.2% compared to 15.6% in Charleston.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Roaring spring at 25.5% versus 19.6% in Charleston.
- Roaring spring has a higher smoking rate at 21.4% compared to 13.0% in Charleston.
- Binge drinking is more common in Charleston at 23.0% compared to 18.5% in Roaring spring.
- Roaring spring has higher obesity rates at 34.7% compared to 31.8% in Charleston.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Roaring spring at 14.0% compared to 9.0% in Charleston.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Charleston | Roaring spring |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.4% (646) | 0.4% (9) |
High School Diploma | 9.1% (13,959) | 25.9% (605) |
Less than High School | 4.3% (6,655) | 7.2% (168) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 39.9% (61,263) | 13.5% (316) |
Education Levels Comparison: Charleston vs Roaring spring
- The percentage of residents with no formal schooling is the same in both Charleston and Roaring spring at 0.4%.
- In Roaring spring, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 25.9% compared to 9.1% in Charleston.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Roaring spring at 7.2%, compared to 4.3% in Charleston.
- A higher percentage of residents in Charleston hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 39.9% compared to 13.5% in Roaring spring.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.