Demographics details for Charleston, SC vs Redford, MI
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Charleston, SC vs Redford, MI.
Data | Charleston | Redford |
---|---|---|
Population | 153,672 | 46,899 |
Median Age | 36.3 years | 40.0 years |
Median Income | $83,891 | $59,000 |
Married Families | 37.0% | 57.0% |
Poverty Level | 12% | 10% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.8 | 4.8 |
Population Comparison: Charleston vs Redford
- In Charleston, the population is higher at 153,672, compared to 46,899 in Redford.
- The median age in Redford is higher at 40.0 years, compared to 36.3 years in Charleston.
- Charleston has a higher median income of $83,891 compared to $59,000 in Redford.
- In Redford, the percentage of married families is higher at 57.0%, compared to 37.0% in Charleston.
- Charleston has a higher poverty level at 12% compared to 10% in Redford.
- Redford has a higher unemployment rate at 4.8% compared to 3.8% in Charleston.
Demographics
Demographics Charleston vs Redford provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Charleston | Redford |
---|---|---|
Black | 18 | 17 |
White | 71 | 74 |
Asian | 2 | 4 |
Hispanic | 5 | 5 |
Two or More Races | 4 | 5 |
American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Charleston vs Redford
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Charleston at 18% compared to 17% in Redford.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Redford at 74% compared to 71% in Charleston.
- In Redford, the Asian population stands at 4%, greater than 2% in Charleston.
- The percentage of Hispanic residents is the same in both Charleston and Redford at 5%.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Redford at 5%, compared to 4% in Charleston.
- In Redford, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Charleston.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Charleston | Redford |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 15.6% | Data is updating% |
Physical Health Not Good | 9.4% | Data is updating% |
Depression | 19.6% | Data is updating% |
Smoking | 13.0% | Data is updating% |
Binge Drinking | 23.0% | Data is updating% |
Obesity | 31.8% | Data is updating% |
Disability Percentage | 9.0% | Data is updating% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Charleston vs Redford
- More residents in Charleston report poor mental health at 15.6% compared to 0.0% in Redford.
- Depression is more prevalent in Charleston at 19.6% compared to 0.0% in Redford.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Charleston at 13.0% compared to 0.0% in Redford.
- Binge drinking is more common in Charleston at 23.0% compared to 0.0% in Redford.
- Obesity rates are higher in Charleston at 31.8% compared to 0.0% in Redford.
- Disability percentages are higher in Charleston at 9.0% compared to 0.0% in Redford.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Charleston | Redford |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.4% (646) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
High School Diploma | 9.1% (13,959) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
Less than High School | 4.3% (6,655) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 39.9% (61,263) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
Education Levels Comparison: Charleston vs Redford
- A higher percentage of residents in Charleston have no formal schooling at 0.4% compared to 0.0% in Redford.
- A higher percentage of residents in Charleston hold a high school diploma at 9.1% compared to 0.0% in Redford.
- More residents in Charleston have less than a high school education at 4.3% compared to 0.0% in Redford.
- A higher percentage of residents in Charleston hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 39.9% compared to 0.0% in Redford.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.