Demographics details for Charleston, SC vs Pleasant grove, UT

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Charleston, SC vs Pleasant grove, UT.

Data Charleston Pleasant grove
Population 153,672 37,630
Median Age 36.3 years 27.6 years
Median Income $83,891 $91,322
Married Families 37.0% 45.0%
Poverty Level 12% 7%
Unemployment Rate 3.8 3.6

Population Comparison: Charleston vs Pleasant grove

  • In Charleston, the population is higher at 153,672, compared to 37,630 in Pleasant grove.
  • Residents in Charleston have a higher median age of 36.3 years compared to 27.6 years in Pleasant grove.
  • Pleasant grove has a higher median income of $91,322, compared to $83,891 in Charleston.
  • In Pleasant grove, the percentage of married families is higher at 45.0%, compared to 37.0% in Charleston.
  • Charleston has a higher poverty level at 12% compared to 7% in Pleasant grove.
  • The unemployment rate in Charleston is higher at 3.8%, compared to 3.6% in Pleasant grove.

Demographics

Demographics Charleston vs Pleasant grove provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Charleston Pleasant grove
Black 18 Data is updating
White 71 81
Asian 2 2
Hispanic 5 10
Two or More Races 4 7
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Charleston vs Pleasant grove

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Charleston at 18% compared to 0% in Pleasant grove.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Pleasant grove at 81% compared to 71% in Charleston.
  • Both Charleston and Pleasant grove have the same percentage of Asian residents at 2%.
  • Pleasant grove has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 10%, compared to 5% in Charleston.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Pleasant grove at 7%, compared to 4% in Charleston.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Charleston and Pleasant grove at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Charleston Pleasant grove
Mental Health Not Good 15.6% 14.8%
Physical Health Not Good 9.4% 10.3%
Depression 19.6% 23.9%
Smoking 13.0% 7.2%
Binge Drinking 23.0% 8.3%
Obesity 31.8% 30.6%
Disability Percentage 9.0% 9.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Charleston vs Pleasant grove

  • More residents in Charleston report poor mental health at 15.6% compared to 14.8% in Pleasant grove.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Pleasant grove at 23.9% versus 19.6% in Charleston.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Charleston at 13.0% compared to 7.2% in Pleasant grove.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Charleston at 23.0% compared to 8.3% in Pleasant grove.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Charleston at 31.8% compared to 30.6% in Pleasant grove.
  • Disability percentages are the same in both Charleston and Pleasant grove at 9.0%.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Charleston Pleasant grove
No Schooling 0.4% (646) 0.6% (207)
High School Diploma 9.1% (13,959) 8.2% (3,089)
Less than High School 4.3% (6,655) 4.9% (1,844)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 39.9% (61,263) 22.1% (8,335)

Education Levels Comparison: Charleston vs Pleasant grove

  • In Pleasant grove, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.6% compared to 0.4% in Charleston.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Charleston hold a high school diploma at 9.1% compared to 8.2% in Pleasant grove.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Pleasant grove at 4.9%, compared to 4.3% in Charleston.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Charleston hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 39.9% compared to 22.1% in Pleasant grove.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.