Demographics details for Charleston, SC vs Medford, MA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Charleston, SC vs Medford, MA.
| Data | Charleston | Medford |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 153,672 | 65,399 |
| Median Age | 36.3 years | 35.4 years |
| Median Income | $83,891 | $114,863 |
| Married Families | 37.0% | 34.0% |
| Poverty Level | 12% | 7% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.8 | 3.6 |
Population Comparison: Charleston vs Medford
- In Charleston, the population is higher at 153,672, compared to 65,399 in Medford.
- Residents in Charleston have a higher median age of 36.3 years compared to 35.4 years in Medford.
- Medford has a higher median income of $114,863, compared to $83,891 in Charleston.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Charleston at 37.0% compared to 34.0% in Medford.
- Charleston has a higher poverty level at 12% compared to 7% in Medford.
- The unemployment rate in Charleston is higher at 3.8%, compared to 3.6% in Medford.
Demographics
Demographics Charleston vs Medford provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Charleston | Medford |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 18 | 7 |
| White | 71 | 67 |
| Asian | 2 | 11 |
| Hispanic | 5 | 8 |
| Two or More Races | 4 | 7 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Charleston vs Medford
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Charleston at 18% compared to 7% in Medford.
- Charleston has a higher percentage of White residents at 71% compared to 67% in Medford.
- In Medford, the Asian population stands at 11%, greater than 2% in Charleston.
- Medford has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 8%, compared to 5% in Charleston.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Medford at 7%, compared to 4% in Charleston.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Charleston and Medford at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Charleston | Medford |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.6% | 14.3% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 9.4% | 8.7% |
| Depression | 19.6% | 21.1% |
| Smoking | 13.0% | 10.6% |
| Binge Drinking | 23.0% | 18.7% |
| Obesity | 31.8% | 25.1% |
| Disability Percentage | 9.0% | 7.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Charleston vs Medford
- More residents in Charleston report poor mental health at 15.6% compared to 14.3% in Medford.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Medford at 21.1% versus 19.6% in Charleston.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Charleston at 13.0% compared to 10.6% in Medford.
- Binge drinking is more common in Charleston at 23.0% compared to 18.7% in Medford.
- Obesity rates are higher in Charleston at 31.8% compared to 25.1% in Medford.
- Disability percentages are higher in Charleston at 9.0% compared to 7.0% in Medford.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Charleston | Medford |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.4% (646) | 0.6% (406) |
| High School Diploma | 9.1% (13,959) | 12.5% (8,155) |
| Less than High School | 4.3% (6,655) | 7.9% (5,192) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 39.9% (61,263) | 38.9% (25,424) |
Education Levels Comparison: Charleston vs Medford
- In Medford, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.6% compared to 0.4% in Charleston.
- In Medford, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 12.5% compared to 9.1% in Charleston.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Medford at 7.9%, compared to 4.3% in Charleston.
- A higher percentage of residents in Charleston hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 39.9% compared to 38.9% in Medford.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.