Demographics details for Charleston, SC vs Mcdonough, GA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Charleston, SC vs Mcdonough, GA.
| Data | Charleston | Mcdonough |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 153,672 | 30,340 |
| Median Age | 36.3 years | 31.0 years |
| Median Income | $83,891 | $77,804 |
| Married Families | 37.0% | 31.0% |
| Poverty Level | 12% | 13% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.8 | 5.9 |
Population Comparison: Charleston vs Mcdonough
- In Charleston, the population is higher at 153,672, compared to 30,340 in Mcdonough.
- Residents in Charleston have a higher median age of 36.3 years compared to 31.0 years in Mcdonough.
- Charleston has a higher median income of $83,891 compared to $77,804 in Mcdonough.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Charleston at 37.0% compared to 31.0% in Mcdonough.
- The poverty level is higher in Mcdonough at 13%, compared to 12% in Charleston.
- Mcdonough has a higher unemployment rate at 5.9% compared to 3.8% in Charleston.
Demographics
Demographics Charleston vs Mcdonough provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Charleston | Mcdonough |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 18 | 70 |
| White | 71 | 14 |
| Asian | 2 | 2 |
| Hispanic | 5 | 6 |
| Two or More Races | 4 | 8 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Charleston vs Mcdonough
- In Mcdonough, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 70% compared to 18% in Charleston.
- Charleston has a higher percentage of White residents at 71% compared to 14% in Mcdonough.
- Both Charleston and Mcdonough have the same percentage of Asian residents at 2%.
- Mcdonough has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 6%, compared to 5% in Charleston.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Mcdonough at 8%, compared to 4% in Charleston.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Charleston and Mcdonough at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Charleston | Mcdonough |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.6% | 16.4% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 9.4% | 11.6% |
| Depression | 19.6% | 19.6% |
| Smoking | 13.0% | 16.1% |
| Binge Drinking | 23.0% | 15.1% |
| Obesity | 31.8% | 39.5% |
| Disability Percentage | 9.0% | 7.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Charleston vs Mcdonough
- In Mcdonough, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 16.4% compared to 15.6% in Charleston.
- Both cities have comparable depression rates at 19.6%.
- Mcdonough has a higher smoking rate at 16.1% compared to 13.0% in Charleston.
- Binge drinking is more common in Charleston at 23.0% compared to 15.1% in Mcdonough.
- Mcdonough has higher obesity rates at 39.5% compared to 31.8% in Charleston.
- Disability percentages are higher in Charleston at 9.0% compared to 7.0% in Mcdonough.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Charleston | Mcdonough |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.4% (646) | 0.7% (221) |
| High School Diploma | 9.1% (13,959) | 14.8% (4,501) |
| Less than High School | 4.3% (6,655) | 4.9% (1,500) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 39.9% (61,263) | 16.1% (4,882) |
Education Levels Comparison: Charleston vs Mcdonough
- In Mcdonough, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.7% compared to 0.4% in Charleston.
- In Mcdonough, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 14.8% compared to 9.1% in Charleston.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Mcdonough at 4.9%, compared to 4.3% in Charleston.
- A higher percentage of residents in Charleston hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 39.9% compared to 16.1% in Mcdonough.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.