Demographics details for Charleston, SC vs Lewiston, ME
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Charleston, SC vs Lewiston, ME.
Data | Charleston | Lewiston |
---|---|---|
Population | 153,672 | 38,493 |
Median Age | 36.3 years | 39.5 years |
Median Income | $83,891 | $54,317 |
Married Families | 37.0% | 33.0% |
Poverty Level | 12% | 11% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.8 | 3.2 |
Population Comparison: Charleston vs Lewiston
- In Charleston, the population is higher at 153,672, compared to 38,493 in Lewiston.
- The median age in Lewiston is higher at 39.5 years, compared to 36.3 years in Charleston.
- Charleston has a higher median income of $83,891 compared to $54,317 in Lewiston.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Charleston at 37.0% compared to 33.0% in Lewiston.
- Charleston has a higher poverty level at 12% compared to 11% in Lewiston.
- The unemployment rate in Charleston is higher at 3.8%, compared to 3.2% in Lewiston.
Demographics
Demographics Charleston vs Lewiston provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Charleston | Lewiston |
---|---|---|
Black | 18 | 11 |
White | 71 | 79 |
Asian | 2 | 2 |
Hispanic | 5 | 3 |
Two or More Races | 4 | 5 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Charleston vs Lewiston
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Charleston at 18% compared to 11% in Lewiston.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Lewiston at 79% compared to 71% in Charleston.
- Both Charleston and Lewiston have the same percentage of Asian residents at 2%.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Charleston at 5% compared to 3% in Lewiston.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Lewiston at 5%, compared to 4% in Charleston.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Charleston and Lewiston at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Charleston | Lewiston |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 15.6% | 19.5% |
Physical Health Not Good | 9.4% | 13.2% |
Depression | 19.6% | 30.0% |
Smoking | 13.0% | 21.9% |
Binge Drinking | 23.0% | 16.1% |
Obesity | 31.8% | 37.8% |
Disability Percentage | 9.0% | 20.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Charleston vs Lewiston
- In Lewiston, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.5% compared to 15.6% in Charleston.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Lewiston at 30.0% versus 19.6% in Charleston.
- Lewiston has a higher smoking rate at 21.9% compared to 13.0% in Charleston.
- Binge drinking is more common in Charleston at 23.0% compared to 16.1% in Lewiston.
- Lewiston has higher obesity rates at 37.8% compared to 31.8% in Charleston.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Lewiston at 20.0% compared to 9.0% in Charleston.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Charleston | Lewiston |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.4% (646) | 1.5% (574) |
High School Diploma | 9.1% (13,959) | 19.7% (7,566) |
Less than High School | 4.3% (6,655) | 13.5% (5,195) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 39.9% (61,263) | 14.4% (5,538) |
Education Levels Comparison: Charleston vs Lewiston
- In Lewiston, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.5% compared to 0.4% in Charleston.
- In Lewiston, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 19.7% compared to 9.1% in Charleston.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Lewiston at 13.5%, compared to 4.3% in Charleston.
- A higher percentage of residents in Charleston hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 39.9% compared to 14.4% in Lewiston.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.