Demographics details for Charleston, SC vs Hobart, IN
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Charleston, SC vs Hobart, IN.
| Data | Charleston | Hobart |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 153,672 | 29,458 |
| Median Age | 36.3 years | 39.9 years |
| Median Income | $83,891 | $69,398 |
| Married Families | 37.0% | 37.0% |
| Poverty Level | 12% | 8% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.8 | 5.3 |
Population Comparison: Charleston vs Hobart
- In Charleston, the population is higher at 153,672, compared to 29,458 in Hobart.
- The median age in Hobart is higher at 39.9 years, compared to 36.3 years in Charleston.
- Charleston has a higher median income of $83,891 compared to $69,398 in Hobart.
- The percentage of married families is the same in both Charleston and Hobart at 37.0%.
- Charleston has a higher poverty level at 12% compared to 8% in Hobart.
- Hobart has a higher unemployment rate at 5.3% compared to 3.8% in Charleston.
Demographics
Demographics Charleston vs Hobart provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Charleston | Hobart |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 18 | 11 |
| White | 71 | 63 |
| Asian | 2 | 2 |
| Hispanic | 5 | 17 |
| Two or More Races | 4 | 7 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Charleston vs Hobart
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Charleston at 18% compared to 11% in Hobart.
- Charleston has a higher percentage of White residents at 71% compared to 63% in Hobart.
- Both Charleston and Hobart have the same percentage of Asian residents at 2%.
- Hobart has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 17%, compared to 5% in Charleston.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Hobart at 7%, compared to 4% in Charleston.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Charleston and Hobart at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Charleston | Hobart |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.6% | 16.5% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 9.4% | 11.3% |
| Depression | 19.6% | 24.5% |
| Smoking | 13.0% | 18.6% |
| Binge Drinking | 23.0% | 18.9% |
| Obesity | 31.8% | 38.1% |
| Disability Percentage | 9.0% | 14.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Charleston vs Hobart
- In Hobart, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 16.5% compared to 15.6% in Charleston.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Hobart at 24.5% versus 19.6% in Charleston.
- Hobart has a higher smoking rate at 18.6% compared to 13.0% in Charleston.
- Binge drinking is more common in Charleston at 23.0% compared to 18.9% in Hobart.
- Hobart has higher obesity rates at 38.1% compared to 31.8% in Charleston.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Hobart at 14.0% compared to 9.0% in Charleston.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Charleston | Hobart |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.4% (646) | 0.7% (217) |
| High School Diploma | 9.1% (13,959) | 24.5% (7,227) |
| Less than High School | 4.3% (6,655) | 8.2% (2,428) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 39.9% (61,263) | 16.3% (4,813) |
Education Levels Comparison: Charleston vs Hobart
- In Hobart, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.7% compared to 0.4% in Charleston.
- In Hobart, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 24.5% compared to 9.1% in Charleston.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Hobart at 8.2%, compared to 4.3% in Charleston.
- A higher percentage of residents in Charleston hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 39.9% compared to 16.3% in Hobart.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.