Demographics details for Charleston, SC vs Firth, NE
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Charleston, SC vs Firth, NE.
| Data | Charleston | Firth |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 153,672 | 654 |
| Median Age | 36.3 years | 37.0 years |
| Median Income | $83,891 | $86,042 |
| Married Families | 37.0% | 38.0% |
| Poverty Level | 12% | 5% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.8 | 2.5 |
Population Comparison: Charleston vs Firth
- In Charleston, the population is higher at 153,672, compared to 654 in Firth.
- The median age in Firth is higher at 37.0 years, compared to 36.3 years in Charleston.
- Firth has a higher median income of $86,042, compared to $83,891 in Charleston.
- In Firth, the percentage of married families is higher at 38.0%, compared to 37.0% in Charleston.
- Charleston has a higher poverty level at 12% compared to 5% in Firth.
- The unemployment rate in Charleston is higher at 3.8%, compared to 2.5% in Firth.
Demographics
Demographics Charleston vs Firth provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Charleston | Firth |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 18 | Data is updating |
| White | 71 | 85 |
| Asian | 2 | 1 |
| Hispanic | 5 | 8 |
| Two or More Races | 4 | 6 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Charleston vs Firth
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Charleston at 18% compared to 0% in Firth.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Firth at 85% compared to 71% in Charleston.
- The Asian population is larger in Charleston at 2% compared to 1% in Firth.
- Firth has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 8%, compared to 5% in Charleston.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Firth at 6%, compared to 4% in Charleston.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Charleston and Firth at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Charleston | Firth |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.6% | 12.3% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 9.4% | 7.0% |
| Depression | 19.6% | 17.9% |
| Smoking | 13.0% | 11.4% |
| Binge Drinking | 23.0% | 24.1% |
| Obesity | 31.8% | 31.5% |
| Disability Percentage | 9.0% | 6.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Charleston vs Firth
- More residents in Charleston report poor mental health at 15.6% compared to 12.3% in Firth.
- Depression is more prevalent in Charleston at 19.6% compared to 17.9% in Firth.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Charleston at 13.0% compared to 11.4% in Firth.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Firth at 24.1% compared to 23.0% in Charleston.
- Obesity rates are higher in Charleston at 31.8% compared to 31.5% in Firth.
- Disability percentages are higher in Charleston at 9.0% compared to 6.0% in Firth.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Charleston | Firth |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.4% (646) | 3.2% (21) |
| High School Diploma | 9.1% (13,959) | 9.2% (60) |
| Less than High School | 4.3% (6,655) | 10.1% (66) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 39.9% (61,263) | 12.5% (82) |
Education Levels Comparison: Charleston vs Firth
- In Firth, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 3.2% compared to 0.4% in Charleston.
- In Firth, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 9.2% compared to 9.1% in Charleston.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Firth at 10.1%, compared to 4.3% in Charleston.
- A higher percentage of residents in Charleston hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 39.9% compared to 12.5% in Firth.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.