Demographics details for Charleston, SC vs Avon lake, OH
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Charleston, SC vs Avon lake, OH.
| Data | Charleston | Avon lake |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 153,672 | 25,617 |
| Median Age | 36.3 years | 45.2 years |
| Median Income | $83,891 | $103,946 |
| Married Families | 37.0% | 49.0% |
| Poverty Level | 12% | Data is updating |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.8 | 4.0 |
Population Comparison: Charleston vs Avon lake
- In Charleston, the population is higher at 153,672, compared to 25,617 in Avon lake.
- The median age in Avon lake is higher at 45.2 years, compared to 36.3 years in Charleston.
- Avon lake has a higher median income of $103,946, compared to $83,891 in Charleston.
- In Avon lake, the percentage of married families is higher at 49.0%, compared to 37.0% in Charleston.
- Charleston has a higher poverty level at 12% compared to 0% in Avon lake.
- Avon lake has a higher unemployment rate at 4.0% compared to 3.8% in Charleston.
Demographics
Demographics Charleston vs Avon lake provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Charleston | Avon lake |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 18 | 1 |
| White | 71 | 91 |
| Asian | 2 | 3 |
| Hispanic | 5 | 2 |
| Two or More Races | 4 | 3 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Charleston vs Avon lake
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Charleston at 18% compared to 1% in Avon lake.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Avon lake at 91% compared to 71% in Charleston.
- In Avon lake, the Asian population stands at 3%, greater than 2% in Charleston.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Charleston at 5% compared to 2% in Avon lake.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Charleston at 4% compared to 3% in Avon lake.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Charleston and Avon lake at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Charleston | Avon lake |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.6% | 14.4% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 9.4% | 8.8% |
| Depression | 19.6% | 21.3% |
| Smoking | 13.0% | 13.6% |
| Binge Drinking | 23.0% | 21.0% |
| Obesity | 31.8% | 32.4% |
| Disability Percentage | 9.0% | 8.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Charleston vs Avon lake
- More residents in Charleston report poor mental health at 15.6% compared to 14.4% in Avon lake.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Avon lake at 21.3% versus 19.6% in Charleston.
- Avon lake has a higher smoking rate at 13.6% compared to 13.0% in Charleston.
- Binge drinking is more common in Charleston at 23.0% compared to 21.0% in Avon lake.
- Avon lake has higher obesity rates at 32.4% compared to 31.8% in Charleston.
- Disability percentages are higher in Charleston at 9.0% compared to 8.0% in Avon lake.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Charleston | Avon lake |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.4% (646) | 0.3% (84) |
| High School Diploma | 9.1% (13,959) | 10.7% (2,732) |
| Less than High School | 4.3% (6,655) | 2.8% (722) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 39.9% (61,263) | 38.3% (9,818) |
Education Levels Comparison: Charleston vs Avon lake
- A higher percentage of residents in Charleston have no formal schooling at 0.4% compared to 0.3% in Avon lake.
- In Avon lake, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 10.7% compared to 9.1% in Charleston.
- More residents in Charleston have less than a high school education at 4.3% compared to 2.8% in Avon lake.
- A higher percentage of residents in Charleston hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 39.9% compared to 38.3% in Avon lake.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.