Demographics details for Charleston, SC vs Anchorage, AK
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Charleston, SC vs Anchorage, AK.
| Data | Charleston | Anchorage |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 153,672 | 287,145 |
| Median Age | 36.3 years | 34.5 years |
| Median Income | $83,891 | $95,731 |
| Married Families | 37.0% | 39.0% |
| Poverty Level | 12% | 11% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.8 | 4.2 |
Population Comparison: Charleston vs Anchorage
- The population in Anchorage is higher at 287,145, compared to 153,672 in Charleston.
- Residents in Charleston have a higher median age of 36.3 years compared to 34.5 years in Anchorage.
- Anchorage has a higher median income of $95,731, compared to $83,891 in Charleston.
- In Anchorage, the percentage of married families is higher at 39.0%, compared to 37.0% in Charleston.
- Charleston has a higher poverty level at 12% compared to 11% in Anchorage.
- Anchorage has a higher unemployment rate at 4.2% compared to 3.8% in Charleston.
Demographics
Demographics Charleston vs Anchorage provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Charleston | Anchorage |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 18 | 5 |
| White | 71 | 55 |
| Asian | 2 | 10 |
| Hispanic | 5 | 10 |
| Two or More Races | 4 | 13 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 7 |
Demographics Comparison: Charleston vs Anchorage
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Charleston at 18% compared to 5% in Anchorage.
- Charleston has a higher percentage of White residents at 71% compared to 55% in Anchorage.
- In Anchorage, the Asian population stands at 10%, greater than 2% in Charleston.
- Anchorage has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 10%, compared to 5% in Charleston.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Anchorage at 13%, compared to 4% in Charleston.
- In Anchorage, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 7%, compared to 0% in Charleston.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Charleston | Anchorage |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.6% | 14.5% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 9.4% | 10.3% |
| Depression | 19.6% | 19.5% |
| Smoking | 13.0% | 14.9% |
| Binge Drinking | 23.0% | 17.8% |
| Obesity | 31.8% | 32.9% |
| Disability Percentage | 9.0% | 11.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Charleston vs Anchorage
- More residents in Charleston report poor mental health at 15.6% compared to 14.5% in Anchorage.
- Depression is more prevalent in Charleston at 19.6% compared to 19.5% in Anchorage.
- Anchorage has a higher smoking rate at 14.9% compared to 13.0% in Charleston.
- Binge drinking is more common in Charleston at 23.0% compared to 17.8% in Anchorage.
- Anchorage has higher obesity rates at 32.9% compared to 31.8% in Charleston.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Anchorage at 11.0% compared to 9.0% in Charleston.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Charleston | Anchorage |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.4% (646) | 0.7% (1,971) |
| High School Diploma | 9.1% (13,959) | 13.5% (38,782) |
| Less than High School | 4.3% (6,655) | 5.8% (16,779) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 39.9% (61,263) | 24.8% (71,274) |
Education Levels Comparison: Charleston vs Anchorage
- In Anchorage, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.7% compared to 0.4% in Charleston.
- In Anchorage, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 13.5% compared to 9.1% in Charleston.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Anchorage at 5.8%, compared to 4.3% in Charleston.
- A higher percentage of residents in Charleston hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 39.9% compared to 24.8% in Anchorage.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.