Demographics details for Charleston, IL vs Wallsburg, UT
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Charleston, IL vs Wallsburg, UT.
Data | Charleston | Wallsburg |
---|---|---|
Population | 17,119 | 297 |
Median Age | 29.4 years | 40.9 years |
Median Income | $47,533 | $99,500 |
Married Families | 32.0% | 53.0% |
Poverty Level | 15% | Data is updating |
Unemployment Rate | 5.3 | 2.5 |
Population Comparison: Charleston vs Wallsburg
- In Charleston, the population is higher at 17,119, compared to 297 in Wallsburg.
- The median age in Wallsburg is higher at 40.9 years, compared to 29.4 years in Charleston.
- Wallsburg has a higher median income of $99,500, compared to $47,533 in Charleston.
- In Wallsburg, the percentage of married families is higher at 53.0%, compared to 32.0% in Charleston.
- Charleston has a higher poverty level at 15% compared to 0% in Wallsburg.
- The unemployment rate in Charleston is higher at 5.3%, compared to 2.5% in Wallsburg.
Demographics
Demographics Charleston vs Wallsburg provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Charleston | Wallsburg |
---|---|---|
Black | 8 | Data is updating |
White | 83 | 93 |
Asian | 2 | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 4 | 7 |
Two or More Races | 3 | Data is updating |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Charleston vs Wallsburg
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Charleston at 8% compared to 0% in Wallsburg.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Wallsburg at 93% compared to 83% in Charleston.
- The Asian population is larger in Charleston at 2% compared to 0% in Wallsburg.
- Wallsburg has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 7%, compared to 4% in Charleston.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Charleston at 3% compared to 0% in Wallsburg.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Charleston and Wallsburg at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Charleston | Wallsburg |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 17.9% | 15.3% |
Physical Health Not Good | 12.5% | 9.7% |
Depression | 24.2% | 22.8% |
Smoking | 20.0% | 9.1% |
Binge Drinking | 16.4% | 13.2% |
Obesity | 36.5% | 28.0% |
Disability Percentage | 18.0% | 11.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Charleston vs Wallsburg
- More residents in Charleston report poor mental health at 17.9% compared to 15.3% in Wallsburg.
- Depression is more prevalent in Charleston at 24.2% compared to 22.8% in Wallsburg.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Charleston at 20.0% compared to 9.1% in Wallsburg.
- Binge drinking is more common in Charleston at 16.4% compared to 13.2% in Wallsburg.
- Obesity rates are higher in Charleston at 36.5% compared to 28.0% in Wallsburg.
- Disability percentages are higher in Charleston at 18.0% compared to 11.0% in Wallsburg.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Charleston | Wallsburg |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.4% (68) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
High School Diploma | 13.6% (2,331) | 27.6% (82) |
Less than High School | 8.1% (1,387) | 7.4% (22) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 19.3% (3,307) | 9.4% (28) |
Education Levels Comparison: Charleston vs Wallsburg
- A higher percentage of residents in Charleston have no formal schooling at 0.4% compared to 0.0% in Wallsburg.
- In Wallsburg, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 27.6% compared to 13.6% in Charleston.
- More residents in Charleston have less than a high school education at 8.1% compared to 7.4% in Wallsburg.
- A higher percentage of residents in Charleston hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 19.3% compared to 9.4% in Wallsburg.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.