Demographics details for Charleston, IL vs Simpsonville, SC

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Charleston, IL vs Simpsonville, SC.

Data Charleston Simpsonville
Population 17,119 26,748
Median Age 29.4 years 37.8 years
Median Income $47,533 $79,937
Married Families 32.0% 38.0%
Poverty Level 15% 7%
Unemployment Rate 5.3 3.9

Population Comparison: Charleston vs Simpsonville

  • The population in Simpsonville is higher at 26,748, compared to 17,119 in Charleston.
  • The median age in Simpsonville is higher at 37.8 years, compared to 29.4 years in Charleston.
  • Simpsonville has a higher median income of $79,937, compared to $47,533 in Charleston.
  • In Simpsonville, the percentage of married families is higher at 38.0%, compared to 32.0% in Charleston.
  • Charleston has a higher poverty level at 15% compared to 7% in Simpsonville.
  • The unemployment rate in Charleston is higher at 5.3%, compared to 3.9% in Simpsonville.

Demographics

Demographics Charleston vs Simpsonville provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Charleston Simpsonville
Black 8 21
White 83 66
Asian 2 1
Hispanic 4 7
Two or More Races 3 5
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Charleston vs Simpsonville

  • In Simpsonville, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 21% compared to 8% in Charleston.
  • Charleston has a higher percentage of White residents at 83% compared to 66% in Simpsonville.
  • The Asian population is larger in Charleston at 2% compared to 1% in Simpsonville.
  • Simpsonville has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 7%, compared to 4% in Charleston.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Simpsonville at 5%, compared to 3% in Charleston.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Charleston and Simpsonville at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Charleston Simpsonville
Mental Health Not Good 17.9% 15.2%
Physical Health Not Good 12.5% 9.6%
Depression 24.2% 19.9%
Smoking 20.0% 13.5%
Binge Drinking 16.4% 17.8%
Obesity 36.5% 31.9%
Disability Percentage 18.0% 9.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Charleston vs Simpsonville

  • More residents in Charleston report poor mental health at 17.9% compared to 15.2% in Simpsonville.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Charleston at 24.2% compared to 19.9% in Simpsonville.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Charleston at 20.0% compared to 13.5% in Simpsonville.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Simpsonville at 17.8% compared to 16.4% in Charleston.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Charleston at 36.5% compared to 31.9% in Simpsonville.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Charleston at 18.0% compared to 9.0% in Simpsonville.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Charleston Simpsonville
No Schooling 0.4% (68) 0.8% (225)
High School Diploma 13.6% (2,331) 14.4% (3,847)
Less than High School 8.1% (1,387) 6.1% (1,645)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 19.3% (3,307) 21.5% (5,741)

Education Levels Comparison: Charleston vs Simpsonville

  • In Simpsonville, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.8% compared to 0.4% in Charleston.
  • In Simpsonville, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 14.4% compared to 13.6% in Charleston.
  • More residents in Charleston have less than a high school education at 8.1% compared to 6.1% in Simpsonville.
  • In Simpsonville, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 21.5% compared to 19.3% in Charleston.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.