Demographics details for Charleston, IL vs Puryear, TN
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Charleston, IL vs Puryear, TN.
| Data | Charleston | Puryear |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 17,119 | 705 |
| Median Age | 29.4 years | 40.6 years |
| Median Income | $47,533 | $42,857 |
| Married Families | 32.0% | 45.0% |
| Poverty Level | 15% | 9% |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.3 | 3.1 |
Population Comparison: Charleston vs Puryear
- In Charleston, the population is higher at 17,119, compared to 705 in Puryear.
- The median age in Puryear is higher at 40.6 years, compared to 29.4 years in Charleston.
- Charleston has a higher median income of $47,533 compared to $42,857 in Puryear.
- In Puryear, the percentage of married families is higher at 45.0%, compared to 32.0% in Charleston.
- Charleston has a higher poverty level at 15% compared to 9% in Puryear.
- The unemployment rate in Charleston is higher at 5.3%, compared to 3.1% in Puryear.
Demographics
Demographics Charleston vs Puryear provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Charleston | Puryear |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 8 | 5 |
| White | 83 | 80 |
| Asian | 2 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 4 | 11 |
| Two or More Races | 3 | 4 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Charleston vs Puryear
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Charleston at 8% compared to 5% in Puryear.
- Charleston has a higher percentage of White residents at 83% compared to 80% in Puryear.
- The Asian population is larger in Charleston at 2% compared to 0% in Puryear.
- Puryear has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 11%, compared to 4% in Charleston.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Puryear at 4%, compared to 3% in Charleston.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Charleston and Puryear at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Charleston | Puryear |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.9% | 20.6% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.5% | 14.2% |
| Depression | 24.2% | 29.2% |
| Smoking | 20.0% | 24.8% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.4% | 16.0% |
| Obesity | 36.5% | 37.9% |
| Disability Percentage | 18.0% | 31.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Charleston vs Puryear
- In Puryear, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 20.6% compared to 17.9% in Charleston.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Puryear at 29.2% versus 24.2% in Charleston.
- Puryear has a higher smoking rate at 24.8% compared to 20.0% in Charleston.
- Binge drinking is more common in Charleston at 16.4% compared to 16.0% in Puryear.
- Puryear has higher obesity rates at 37.9% compared to 36.5% in Charleston.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Puryear at 31.0% compared to 18.0% in Charleston.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Charleston | Puryear |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.4% (68) | 0.3% (2) |
| High School Diploma | 13.6% (2,331) | 25.5% (180) |
| Less than High School | 8.1% (1,387) | 28.4% (200) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 19.3% (3,307) | 7.8% (55) |
Education Levels Comparison: Charleston vs Puryear
- A higher percentage of residents in Charleston have no formal schooling at 0.4% compared to 0.3% in Puryear.
- In Puryear, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 25.5% compared to 13.6% in Charleston.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Puryear at 28.4%, compared to 8.1% in Charleston.
- A higher percentage of residents in Charleston hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 19.3% compared to 7.8% in Puryear.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.