Demographics details for Charleston, IL vs Pulaski, WI
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Charleston, IL vs Pulaski, WI.
| Data | Charleston | Pulaski |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 17,119 | 4,045 |
| Median Age | 29.4 years | 29.1 years |
| Median Income | $47,533 | $65,906 |
| Married Families | 32.0% | 28.0% |
| Poverty Level | 15% | 10% |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.3 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Charleston vs Pulaski
- In Charleston, the population is higher at 17,119, compared to 4,045 in Pulaski.
- Residents in Charleston have a higher median age of 29.4 years compared to 29.1 years in Pulaski.
- Pulaski has a higher median income of $65,906, compared to $47,533 in Charleston.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Charleston at 32.0% compared to 28.0% in Pulaski.
- Charleston has a higher poverty level at 15% compared to 10% in Pulaski.
- The unemployment rate in Charleston is higher at 5.3%, compared to 3.5% in Pulaski.
Demographics
Demographics Charleston vs Pulaski provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Charleston | Pulaski |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 8 | 1 |
| White | 83 | 84 |
| Asian | 2 | 2 |
| Hispanic | 4 | 2 |
| Two or More Races | 3 | 10 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Charleston vs Pulaski
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Charleston at 8% compared to 1% in Pulaski.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Pulaski at 84% compared to 83% in Charleston.
- Both Charleston and Pulaski have the same percentage of Asian residents at 2%.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Charleston at 4% compared to 2% in Pulaski.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Pulaski at 10%, compared to 3% in Charleston.
- In Pulaski, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Charleston.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Charleston | Pulaski |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.9% | 14.5% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.5% | 9.4% |
| Depression | 24.2% | 22.4% |
| Smoking | 20.0% | 14.6% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.4% | 24.7% |
| Obesity | 36.5% | 35.4% |
| Disability Percentage | 18.0% | 14.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Charleston vs Pulaski
- More residents in Charleston report poor mental health at 17.9% compared to 14.5% in Pulaski.
- Depression is more prevalent in Charleston at 24.2% compared to 22.4% in Pulaski.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Charleston at 20.0% compared to 14.6% in Pulaski.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Pulaski at 24.7% compared to 16.4% in Charleston.
- Obesity rates are higher in Charleston at 36.5% compared to 35.4% in Pulaski.
- Disability percentages are higher in Charleston at 18.0% compared to 14.0% in Pulaski.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Charleston | Pulaski |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.4% (68) | 0.4% (16) |
| High School Diploma | 13.6% (2,331) | 17.7% (715) |
| Less than High School | 8.1% (1,387) | 4.7% (191) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 19.3% (3,307) | 10.7% (432) |
Education Levels Comparison: Charleston vs Pulaski
- The percentage of residents with no formal schooling is the same in both Charleston and Pulaski at 0.4%.
- In Pulaski, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 17.7% compared to 13.6% in Charleston.
- More residents in Charleston have less than a high school education at 8.1% compared to 4.7% in Pulaski.
- A higher percentage of residents in Charleston hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 19.3% compared to 10.7% in Pulaski.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.