Demographics details for Charleston, IL vs Perrysburg, OH
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Charleston, IL vs Perrysburg, OH.
Data | Charleston | Perrysburg |
---|---|---|
Population | 17,119 | 25,161 |
Median Age | 29.4 years | 38.9 years |
Median Income | $47,533 | $98,419 |
Married Families | 32.0% | 42.0% |
Poverty Level | 15% | 6% |
Unemployment Rate | 5.3 | 4.2 |
Population Comparison: Charleston vs Perrysburg
- The population in Perrysburg is higher at 25,161, compared to 17,119 in Charleston.
- The median age in Perrysburg is higher at 38.9 years, compared to 29.4 years in Charleston.
- Perrysburg has a higher median income of $98,419, compared to $47,533 in Charleston.
- In Perrysburg, the percentage of married families is higher at 42.0%, compared to 32.0% in Charleston.
- Charleston has a higher poverty level at 15% compared to 6% in Perrysburg.
- The unemployment rate in Charleston is higher at 5.3%, compared to 4.2% in Perrysburg.
Demographics
Demographics Charleston vs Perrysburg provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Charleston | Perrysburg |
---|---|---|
Black | 8 | 2 |
White | 83 | 87 |
Asian | 2 | 3 |
Hispanic | 4 | 4 |
Two or More Races | 3 | 4 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Charleston vs Perrysburg
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Charleston at 8% compared to 2% in Perrysburg.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Perrysburg at 87% compared to 83% in Charleston.
- In Perrysburg, the Asian population stands at 3%, greater than 2% in Charleston.
- The percentage of Hispanic residents is the same in both Charleston and Perrysburg at 4%.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Perrysburg at 4%, compared to 3% in Charleston.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Charleston and Perrysburg at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Charleston | Perrysburg |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 17.9% | 14.3% |
Physical Health Not Good | 12.5% | 8.4% |
Depression | 24.2% | 22.5% |
Smoking | 20.0% | 12.1% |
Binge Drinking | 16.4% | 19.0% |
Obesity | 36.5% | 36.6% |
Disability Percentage | 18.0% | 10.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Charleston vs Perrysburg
- More residents in Charleston report poor mental health at 17.9% compared to 14.3% in Perrysburg.
- Depression is more prevalent in Charleston at 24.2% compared to 22.5% in Perrysburg.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Charleston at 20.0% compared to 12.1% in Perrysburg.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Perrysburg at 19.0% compared to 16.4% in Charleston.
- Perrysburg has higher obesity rates at 36.6% compared to 36.5% in Charleston.
- Disability percentages are higher in Charleston at 18.0% compared to 10.0% in Perrysburg.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Charleston | Perrysburg |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.4% (68) | 0.2% (53) |
High School Diploma | 13.6% (2,331) | 8.7% (2,192) |
Less than High School | 8.1% (1,387) | 2.6% (645) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 19.3% (3,307) | 38.5% (9,689) |
Education Levels Comparison: Charleston vs Perrysburg
- A higher percentage of residents in Charleston have no formal schooling at 0.4% compared to 0.2% in Perrysburg.
- A higher percentage of residents in Charleston hold a high school diploma at 13.6% compared to 8.7% in Perrysburg.
- More residents in Charleston have less than a high school education at 8.1% compared to 2.6% in Perrysburg.
- In Perrysburg, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 38.5% compared to 19.3% in Charleston.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.