Demographics details for Charleston, IL vs Pearblossom, CA

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Charleston, IL vs Pearblossom, CA.

Data Charleston Pearblossom
Population 17,119 1,390
Median Age 29.4 years 40.0 years
Median Income $47,533 $55,000
Married Families 32.0% 30.0%
Poverty Level 15% 15%
Unemployment Rate 5.3 5.0

Population Comparison: Charleston vs Pearblossom

  • In Charleston, the population is higher at 17,119, compared to 1,390 in Pearblossom.
  • The median age in Pearblossom is higher at 40.0 years, compared to 29.4 years in Charleston.
  • Pearblossom has a higher median income of $55,000, compared to $47,533 in Charleston.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Charleston at 32.0% compared to 30.0% in Pearblossom.
  • The poverty level is identical in both Charleston and Pearblossom at 15%.
  • The unemployment rate in Charleston is higher at 5.3%, compared to 5.0% in Pearblossom.

Demographics

Demographics Charleston vs Pearblossom provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Charleston Pearblossom
Black 8 2
White 83 90
Asian 2 1
Hispanic 4 5
Two or More Races 3 2
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Charleston vs Pearblossom

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Charleston at 8% compared to 2% in Pearblossom.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Pearblossom at 90% compared to 83% in Charleston.
  • The Asian population is larger in Charleston at 2% compared to 1% in Pearblossom.
  • Pearblossom has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 5%, compared to 4% in Charleston.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Charleston at 3% compared to 2% in Pearblossom.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Charleston and Pearblossom at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Charleston Pearblossom
Mental Health Not Good 17.9% Data is updating%
Physical Health Not Good 12.5% Data is updating%
Depression 24.2% Data is updating%
Smoking 20.0% Data is updating%
Binge Drinking 16.4% Data is updating%
Obesity 36.5% Data is updating%
Disability Percentage 18.0% Data is updating%

Health Statistics Comparison: Charleston vs Pearblossom

  • More residents in Charleston report poor mental health at 17.9% compared to 0.0% in Pearblossom.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Charleston at 24.2% compared to 0.0% in Pearblossom.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Charleston at 20.0% compared to 0.0% in Pearblossom.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Charleston at 16.4% compared to 0.0% in Pearblossom.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Charleston at 36.5% compared to 0.0% in Pearblossom.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Charleston at 18.0% compared to 0.0% in Pearblossom.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Charleston Pearblossom
No Schooling 0.4% (68) 0.0% (Data is updating)
High School Diploma 13.6% (2,331) 0.0% (Data is updating)
Less than High School 8.1% (1,387) 0.0% (Data is updating)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 19.3% (3,307) 0.0% (Data is updating)

Education Levels Comparison: Charleston vs Pearblossom

  • A higher percentage of residents in Charleston have no formal schooling at 0.4% compared to 0.0% in Pearblossom.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Charleston hold a high school diploma at 13.6% compared to 0.0% in Pearblossom.
  • More residents in Charleston have less than a high school education at 8.1% compared to 0.0% in Pearblossom.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Charleston hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 19.3% compared to 0.0% in Pearblossom.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.