Demographics details for Charleston, IL vs Miramar, FL
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Charleston, IL vs Miramar, FL.
| Data | Charleston | Miramar |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 17,119 | 137,228 |
| Median Age | 29.4 years | 38.8 years |
| Median Income | $47,533 | $81,812 |
| Married Families | 32.0% | 35.0% |
| Poverty Level | 15% | 13% |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.3 | 3.4 |
Population Comparison: Charleston vs Miramar
- The population in Miramar is higher at 137,228, compared to 17,119 in Charleston.
- The median age in Miramar is higher at 38.8 years, compared to 29.4 years in Charleston.
- Miramar has a higher median income of $81,812, compared to $47,533 in Charleston.
- In Miramar, the percentage of married families is higher at 35.0%, compared to 32.0% in Charleston.
- Charleston has a higher poverty level at 15% compared to 13% in Miramar.
- The unemployment rate in Charleston is higher at 5.3%, compared to 3.4% in Miramar.
Demographics
Demographics Charleston vs Miramar provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Charleston | Miramar |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 8 | 46 |
| White | 83 | -2 |
| Asian | 2 | 6 |
| Hispanic | 4 | 36 |
| Two or More Races | 3 | 14 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Charleston vs Miramar
- In Miramar, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 46% compared to 8% in Charleston.
- Charleston has a higher percentage of White residents at 83% compared to -2% in Miramar.
- In Miramar, the Asian population stands at 6%, greater than 2% in Charleston.
- Miramar has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 36%, compared to 4% in Charleston.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Miramar at 14%, compared to 3% in Charleston.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Charleston and Miramar at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Charleston | Miramar |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.9% | 14.7% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.5% | 10.1% |
| Depression | 24.2% | 15.1% |
| Smoking | 20.0% | 15.1% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.4% | 13.7% |
| Obesity | 36.5% | 31.0% |
| Disability Percentage | 18.0% | 7.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Charleston vs Miramar
- More residents in Charleston report poor mental health at 17.9% compared to 14.7% in Miramar.
- Depression is more prevalent in Charleston at 24.2% compared to 15.1% in Miramar.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Charleston at 20.0% compared to 15.1% in Miramar.
- Binge drinking is more common in Charleston at 16.4% compared to 13.7% in Miramar.
- Obesity rates are higher in Charleston at 36.5% compared to 31.0% in Miramar.
- Disability percentages are higher in Charleston at 18.0% compared to 7.0% in Miramar.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Charleston | Miramar |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.4% (68) | 1.1% (1,492) |
| High School Diploma | 13.6% (2,331) | 20.7% (28,436) |
| Less than High School | 8.1% (1,387) | 8.9% (12,256) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 19.3% (3,307) | 21.0% (28,796) |
Education Levels Comparison: Charleston vs Miramar
- In Miramar, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.1% compared to 0.4% in Charleston.
- In Miramar, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 20.7% compared to 13.6% in Charleston.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Miramar at 8.9%, compared to 8.1% in Charleston.
- In Miramar, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 21.0% compared to 19.3% in Charleston.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.