Demographics details for Charleston, IL vs Draper, UT
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Charleston, IL vs Draper, UT.
| Data | Charleston | Draper |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 17,119 | 50,731 |
| Median Age | 29.4 years | 33.6 years |
| Median Income | $47,533 | $126,041 |
| Married Families | 32.0% | 45.0% |
| Poverty Level | 15% | Data is updating |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.3 | 4.0 |
Population Comparison: Charleston vs Draper
- The population in Draper is higher at 50,731, compared to 17,119 in Charleston.
- The median age in Draper is higher at 33.6 years, compared to 29.4 years in Charleston.
- Draper has a higher median income of $126,041, compared to $47,533 in Charleston.
- In Draper, the percentage of married families is higher at 45.0%, compared to 32.0% in Charleston.
- Charleston has a higher poverty level at 15% compared to 0% in Draper.
- The unemployment rate in Charleston is higher at 5.3%, compared to 4.0% in Draper.
Demographics
Demographics Charleston vs Draper provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Charleston | Draper |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 8 | 2 |
| White | 83 | 81 |
| Asian | 2 | 4 |
| Hispanic | 4 | 7 |
| Two or More Races | 3 | 6 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Charleston vs Draper
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Charleston at 8% compared to 2% in Draper.
- Charleston has a higher percentage of White residents at 83% compared to 81% in Draper.
- In Draper, the Asian population stands at 4%, greater than 2% in Charleston.
- Draper has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 7%, compared to 4% in Charleston.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Draper at 6%, compared to 3% in Charleston.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Charleston and Draper at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Charleston | Draper |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.9% | 16.0% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.5% | 8.7% |
| Depression | 24.2% | 25.3% |
| Smoking | 20.0% | 7.1% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.4% | 16.7% |
| Obesity | 36.5% | 28.2% |
| Disability Percentage | 18.0% | 6.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Charleston vs Draper
- More residents in Charleston report poor mental health at 17.9% compared to 16.0% in Draper.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Draper at 25.3% versus 24.2% in Charleston.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Charleston at 20.0% compared to 7.1% in Draper.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Draper at 16.7% compared to 16.4% in Charleston.
- Obesity rates are higher in Charleston at 36.5% compared to 28.2% in Draper.
- Disability percentages are higher in Charleston at 18.0% compared to 6.0% in Draper.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Charleston | Draper |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.4% (68) | 0.7% (347) |
| High School Diploma | 13.6% (2,331) | 7.4% (3,771) |
| Less than High School | 8.1% (1,387) | 4.1% (2,077) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 19.3% (3,307) | 30.1% (15,258) |
Education Levels Comparison: Charleston vs Draper
- In Draper, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.7% compared to 0.4% in Charleston.
- A higher percentage of residents in Charleston hold a high school diploma at 13.6% compared to 7.4% in Draper.
- More residents in Charleston have less than a high school education at 8.1% compared to 4.1% in Draper.
- In Draper, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 30.1% compared to 19.3% in Charleston.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.