Demographics details for Charleston, IL vs Dallastown, PA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Charleston, IL vs Dallastown, PA.
Data | Charleston | Dallastown |
---|---|---|
Population | 17,119 | 4,176 |
Median Age | 29.4 years | 39.9 years |
Median Income | $47,533 | $56,397 |
Married Families | 32.0% | 39.0% |
Poverty Level | 15% | 7% |
Unemployment Rate | 5.3 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Charleston vs Dallastown
- In Charleston, the population is higher at 17,119, compared to 4,176 in Dallastown.
- The median age in Dallastown is higher at 39.9 years, compared to 29.4 years in Charleston.
- Dallastown has a higher median income of $56,397, compared to $47,533 in Charleston.
- In Dallastown, the percentage of married families is higher at 39.0%, compared to 32.0% in Charleston.
- Charleston has a higher poverty level at 15% compared to 7% in Dallastown.
- The unemployment rate in Charleston is higher at 5.3%, compared to 3.5% in Dallastown.
Demographics
Demographics Charleston vs Dallastown provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Charleston | Dallastown |
---|---|---|
Black | 8 | 2 |
White | 83 | 92 |
Asian | 2 | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 4 | 4 |
Two or More Races | 3 | 2 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Charleston vs Dallastown
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Charleston at 8% compared to 2% in Dallastown.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Dallastown at 92% compared to 83% in Charleston.
- The Asian population is larger in Charleston at 2% compared to 0% in Dallastown.
- The percentage of Hispanic residents is the same in both Charleston and Dallastown at 4%.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Charleston at 3% compared to 2% in Dallastown.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Charleston and Dallastown at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Charleston | Dallastown |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 17.9% | 17.7% |
Physical Health Not Good | 12.5% | 12.3% |
Depression | 24.2% | 25.2% |
Smoking | 20.0% | 19.4% |
Binge Drinking | 16.4% | 17.4% |
Obesity | 36.5% | 41.0% |
Disability Percentage | 18.0% | 20.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Charleston vs Dallastown
- More residents in Charleston report poor mental health at 17.9% compared to 17.7% in Dallastown.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Dallastown at 25.2% versus 24.2% in Charleston.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Charleston at 20.0% compared to 19.4% in Dallastown.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Dallastown at 17.4% compared to 16.4% in Charleston.
- Dallastown has higher obesity rates at 41.0% compared to 36.5% in Charleston.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Dallastown at 20.0% compared to 18.0% in Charleston.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Charleston | Dallastown |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.4% (68) | 0.0% (1) |
High School Diploma | 13.6% (2,331) | 22.5% (939) |
Less than High School | 8.1% (1,387) | 12.3% (512) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 19.3% (3,307) | 14.3% (599) |
Education Levels Comparison: Charleston vs Dallastown
- A higher percentage of residents in Charleston have no formal schooling at 0.4% compared to 0.0% in Dallastown.
- In Dallastown, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 22.5% compared to 13.6% in Charleston.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Dallastown at 12.3%, compared to 8.1% in Charleston.
- A higher percentage of residents in Charleston hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 19.3% compared to 14.3% in Dallastown.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.