Demographics details for Charleston, IL vs Aberdeen, MD
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Charleston, IL vs Aberdeen, MD.
Data | Charleston | Aberdeen |
---|---|---|
Population | 17,119 | 16,859 |
Median Age | 29.4 years | 37.2 years |
Median Income | $47,533 | $74,555 |
Married Families | 32.0% | 36.0% |
Poverty Level | 15% | 12% |
Unemployment Rate | 5.3 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: Charleston vs Aberdeen
- In Charleston, the population is higher at 17,119, compared to 16,859 in Aberdeen.
- The median age in Aberdeen is higher at 37.2 years, compared to 29.4 years in Charleston.
- Aberdeen has a higher median income of $74,555, compared to $47,533 in Charleston.
- In Aberdeen, the percentage of married families is higher at 36.0%, compared to 32.0% in Charleston.
- Charleston has a higher poverty level at 15% compared to 12% in Aberdeen.
- The unemployment rate in Charleston is higher at 5.3%, compared to 4.5% in Aberdeen.
Demographics
Demographics Charleston vs Aberdeen provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Charleston | Aberdeen |
---|---|---|
Black | 8 | 24 |
White | 83 | 52 |
Asian | 2 | 4 |
Hispanic | 4 | 11 |
Two or More Races | 3 | 9 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Charleston vs Aberdeen
- In Aberdeen, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 24% compared to 8% in Charleston.
- Charleston has a higher percentage of White residents at 83% compared to 52% in Aberdeen.
- In Aberdeen, the Asian population stands at 4%, greater than 2% in Charleston.
- Aberdeen has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 11%, compared to 4% in Charleston.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Aberdeen at 9%, compared to 3% in Charleston.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Charleston and Aberdeen at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Charleston | Aberdeen |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 17.9% | 18.2% |
Physical Health Not Good | 12.5% | 11.9% |
Depression | 24.2% | 22.2% |
Smoking | 20.0% | 19.2% |
Binge Drinking | 16.4% | 14.0% |
Obesity | 36.5% | 37.4% |
Disability Percentage | 18.0% | 15.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Charleston vs Aberdeen
- In Aberdeen, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.2% compared to 17.9% in Charleston.
- Depression is more prevalent in Charleston at 24.2% compared to 22.2% in Aberdeen.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Charleston at 20.0% compared to 19.2% in Aberdeen.
- Binge drinking is more common in Charleston at 16.4% compared to 14.0% in Aberdeen.
- Aberdeen has higher obesity rates at 37.4% compared to 36.5% in Charleston.
- Disability percentages are higher in Charleston at 18.0% compared to 15.0% in Aberdeen.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Charleston | Aberdeen |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.4% (68) | 0.6% (94) |
High School Diploma | 13.6% (2,331) | 15.2% (2,565) |
Less than High School | 8.1% (1,387) | 13.9% (2,349) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 19.3% (3,307) | 18.1% (3,044) |
Education Levels Comparison: Charleston vs Aberdeen
- In Aberdeen, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.6% compared to 0.4% in Charleston.
- In Aberdeen, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 15.2% compared to 13.6% in Charleston.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Aberdeen at 13.9%, compared to 8.1% in Charleston.
- A higher percentage of residents in Charleston hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 19.3% compared to 18.1% in Aberdeen.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.