Demographics details for Chapman, KS vs Laurel, MS
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Chapman, KS vs Laurel, MS.
| Data | Chapman | Laurel |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 1,371 | 17,066 |
| Median Age | 41.4 years | 37.6 years |
| Median Income | $66,964 | $36,336 |
| Married Families | 33.0% | 29.0% |
| Poverty Level | 8% | 20% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.1 | 5.4 |
Population Comparison: Chapman vs Laurel
- The population in Laurel is higher at 17,066, compared to 1,371 in Chapman.
- Residents in Chapman have a higher median age of 41.4 years compared to 37.6 years in Laurel.
- Chapman has a higher median income of $66,964 compared to $36,336 in Laurel.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Chapman at 33.0% compared to 29.0% in Laurel.
- The poverty level is higher in Laurel at 20%, compared to 8% in Chapman.
- Laurel has a higher unemployment rate at 5.4% compared to 3.1% in Chapman.
Demographics
Demographics Chapman vs Laurel provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Chapman | Laurel |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 66 |
| White | 81 | 28 |
| Asian | 3 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 7 | 4 |
| Two or More Races | 7 | 1 |
| American Indian | 2 | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Chapman vs Laurel
- In Laurel, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 66% compared to 0% in Chapman.
- Chapman has a higher percentage of White residents at 81% compared to 28% in Laurel.
- The Asian population is larger in Chapman at 3% compared to 0% in Laurel.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Chapman at 7% compared to 4% in Laurel.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Chapman at 7% compared to 1% in Laurel.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Chapman at 2% compared to 1% in Laurel.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Chapman | Laurel |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.7% | 17.9% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 9.5% | 14.9% |
| Depression | 21.4% | 21.8% |
| Smoking | 16.6% | 23.1% |
| Binge Drinking | 20.2% | 11.6% |
| Obesity | 37.3% | 44.5% |
| Disability Percentage | 14.0% | 18.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Chapman vs Laurel
- In Laurel, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.9% compared to 15.7% in Chapman.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Laurel at 21.8% versus 21.4% in Chapman.
- Laurel has a higher smoking rate at 23.1% compared to 16.6% in Chapman.
- Binge drinking is more common in Chapman at 20.2% compared to 11.6% in Laurel.
- Laurel has higher obesity rates at 44.5% compared to 37.3% in Chapman.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Laurel at 18.0% compared to 14.0% in Chapman.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Chapman | Laurel |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 0.7% (124) |
| High School Diploma | 12.3% (168) | 17.3% (2,956) |
| Less than High School | 5.1% (70) | 17.5% (2,979) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 15.5% (212) | 14.6% (2,485) |
Education Levels Comparison: Chapman vs Laurel
- In Laurel, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.7% compared to 0.0% in Chapman.
- In Laurel, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 17.3% compared to 12.3% in Chapman.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Laurel at 17.5%, compared to 5.1% in Chapman.
- A higher percentage of residents in Chapman hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 15.5% compared to 14.6% in Laurel.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.