Demographics details for Chapman, KS vs Harker heights, TX
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Chapman, KS vs Harker heights, TX.
Data | Chapman | Harker heights |
---|---|---|
Population | 1,371 | 34,102 |
Median Age | 41.4 years | 34.5 years |
Median Income | $66,964 | $72,258 |
Married Families | 33.0% | 35.0% |
Poverty Level | 8% | 9% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.1 | 5.0 |
Population Comparison: Chapman vs Harker heights
- The population in Harker heights is higher at 34,102, compared to 1,371 in Chapman.
- Residents in Chapman have a higher median age of 41.4 years compared to 34.5 years in Harker heights.
- Harker heights has a higher median income of $72,258, compared to $66,964 in Chapman.
- In Harker heights, the percentage of married families is higher at 35.0%, compared to 33.0% in Chapman.
- The poverty level is higher in Harker heights at 9%, compared to 8% in Chapman.
- Harker heights has a higher unemployment rate at 5.0% compared to 3.1% in Chapman.
Demographics
Demographics Chapman vs Harker heights provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Chapman | Harker heights |
---|---|---|
Black | Data is updating | 28 |
White | 81 | 36 |
Asian | 3 | 3 |
Hispanic | 7 | 21 |
Two or More Races | 7 | 11 |
American Indian | 2 | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Chapman vs Harker heights
- In Harker heights, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 28% compared to 0% in Chapman.
- Chapman has a higher percentage of White residents at 81% compared to 36% in Harker heights.
- Both Chapman and Harker heights have the same percentage of Asian residents at 3%.
- Harker heights has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 21%, compared to 7% in Chapman.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Harker heights at 11%, compared to 7% in Chapman.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Chapman at 2% compared to 1% in Harker heights.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Chapman | Harker heights |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 15.7% | 16.5% |
Physical Health Not Good | 9.5% | 10.8% |
Depression | 21.4% | 22.5% |
Smoking | 16.6% | 15.5% |
Binge Drinking | 20.2% | 17.1% |
Obesity | 37.3% | 37.1% |
Disability Percentage | 14.0% | 13.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Chapman vs Harker heights
- In Harker heights, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 16.5% compared to 15.7% in Chapman.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Harker heights at 22.5% versus 21.4% in Chapman.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Chapman at 16.6% compared to 15.5% in Harker heights.
- Binge drinking is more common in Chapman at 20.2% compared to 17.1% in Harker heights.
- Obesity rates are higher in Chapman at 37.3% compared to 37.1% in Harker heights.
- Disability percentages are higher in Chapman at 14.0% compared to 13.0% in Harker heights.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Chapman | Harker heights |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 1.3% (448) |
High School Diploma | 12.3% (168) | 11.6% (3,958) |
Less than High School | 5.1% (70) | 10.3% (3,509) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 15.5% (212) | 18.8% (6,403) |
Education Levels Comparison: Chapman vs Harker heights
- In Harker heights, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.3% compared to 0.0% in Chapman.
- A higher percentage of residents in Chapman hold a high school diploma at 12.3% compared to 11.6% in Harker heights.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Harker heights at 10.3%, compared to 5.1% in Chapman.
- In Harker heights, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 18.8% compared to 15.5% in Chapman.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.