Demographics details for Chapman, KS vs Broad brook, CT
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Chapman, KS vs Broad brook, CT.
| Data | Chapman | Broad brook |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 1,371 | 4,006 |
| Median Age | 41.4 years | 36.9 years |
| Median Income | $66,964 | $93,243 |
| Married Families | 33.0% | 35.0% |
| Poverty Level | 8% | 5% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.1 | 4.2 |
Population Comparison: Chapman vs Broad brook
- The population in Broad brook is higher at 4,006, compared to 1,371 in Chapman.
- Residents in Chapman have a higher median age of 41.4 years compared to 36.9 years in Broad brook.
- Broad brook has a higher median income of $93,243, compared to $66,964 in Chapman.
- In Broad brook, the percentage of married families is higher at 35.0%, compared to 33.0% in Chapman.
- Chapman has a higher poverty level at 8% compared to 5% in Broad brook.
- Broad brook has a higher unemployment rate at 4.2% compared to 3.1% in Chapman.
Demographics
Demographics Chapman vs Broad brook provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Chapman | Broad brook |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 18 |
| White | 81 | 58 |
| Asian | 3 | 10 |
| Hispanic | 7 | 12 |
| Two or More Races | 7 | 2 |
| American Indian | 2 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Chapman vs Broad brook
- In Broad brook, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 18% compared to 0% in Chapman.
- Chapman has a higher percentage of White residents at 81% compared to 58% in Broad brook.
- In Broad brook, the Asian population stands at 10%, greater than 3% in Chapman.
- Broad brook has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 12%, compared to 7% in Chapman.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Chapman at 7% compared to 2% in Broad brook.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Chapman at 2% compared to 0% in Broad brook.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Chapman | Broad brook |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.7% | 16.8% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 9.5% | 9.7% |
| Depression | 21.4% | 24.8% |
| Smoking | 16.6% | 14.2% |
| Binge Drinking | 20.2% | 15.9% |
| Obesity | 37.3% | 33.4% |
| Disability Percentage | 14.0% | 7.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Chapman vs Broad brook
- In Broad brook, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 16.8% compared to 15.7% in Chapman.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Broad brook at 24.8% versus 21.4% in Chapman.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Chapman at 16.6% compared to 14.2% in Broad brook.
- Binge drinking is more common in Chapman at 20.2% compared to 15.9% in Broad brook.
- Obesity rates are higher in Chapman at 37.3% compared to 33.4% in Broad brook.
- Disability percentages are higher in Chapman at 14.0% compared to 7.0% in Broad brook.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Chapman | Broad brook |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 2.8% (113) |
| High School Diploma | 12.3% (168) | 12.6% (504) |
| Less than High School | 5.1% (70) | 5.8% (231) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 15.5% (212) | 30.7% (1,230) |
Education Levels Comparison: Chapman vs Broad brook
- In Broad brook, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.8% compared to 0.0% in Chapman.
- In Broad brook, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 12.6% compared to 12.3% in Chapman.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Broad brook at 5.8%, compared to 5.1% in Chapman.
- In Broad brook, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 30.7% compared to 15.5% in Chapman.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.