Demographics details for Channahon, IL vs Richland, MS
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Channahon, IL vs Richland, MS.
| Data | Channahon | Richland |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 13,926 | 7,297 |
| Median Age | 38.6 years | 37.1 years |
| Median Income | $112,771 | $54,753 |
| Married Families | 47.0% | 40.0% |
| Poverty Level | 4% | 12% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.2 | 4.2 |
Population Comparison: Channahon vs Richland
- In Channahon, the population is higher at 13,926, compared to 7,297 in Richland.
- Residents in Channahon have a higher median age of 38.6 years compared to 37.1 years in Richland.
- Channahon has a higher median income of $112,771 compared to $54,753 in Richland.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Channahon at 47.0% compared to 40.0% in Richland.
- The poverty level is higher in Richland at 12%, compared to 4% in Channahon.
- The unemployment rate is the same in both Channahon and Richland at 4.2%.
Demographics
Demographics Channahon vs Richland provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Channahon | Richland |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 1 | 19 |
| White | 85 | 74 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 2 |
| Hispanic | 12 | 3 |
| Two or More Races | 2 | 2 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Channahon vs Richland
- In Richland, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 19% compared to 1% in Channahon.
- Channahon has a higher percentage of White residents at 85% compared to 74% in Richland.
- In Richland, the Asian population stands at 2%, greater than 0% in Channahon.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Channahon at 12% compared to 3% in Richland.
- Both Channahon and Richland have the same percentage of residents identifying as two or more races at 2%.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Channahon and Richland at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Channahon | Richland |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 14.6% | 16.9% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 9.5% | 11.7% |
| Depression | 20.2% | 23.4% |
| Smoking | 13.8% | 19.3% |
| Binge Drinking | 18.9% | 14.2% |
| Obesity | 33.1% | 37.4% |
| Disability Percentage | 9.0% | 13.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Channahon vs Richland
- In Richland, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 16.9% compared to 14.6% in Channahon.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Richland at 23.4% versus 20.2% in Channahon.
- Richland has a higher smoking rate at 19.3% compared to 13.8% in Channahon.
- Binge drinking is more common in Channahon at 18.9% compared to 14.2% in Richland.
- Richland has higher obesity rates at 37.4% compared to 33.1% in Channahon.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Richland at 13.0% compared to 9.0% in Channahon.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Channahon | Richland |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.5% (72) | 1.7% (122) |
| High School Diploma | 14.0% (1,945) | 12.6% (916) |
| Less than High School | 3.9% (544) | 10.0% (732) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 19.1% (2,663) | 16.1% (1,175) |
Education Levels Comparison: Channahon vs Richland
- In Richland, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.7% compared to 0.5% in Channahon.
- A higher percentage of residents in Channahon hold a high school diploma at 14.0% compared to 12.6% in Richland.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Richland at 10.0%, compared to 3.9% in Channahon.
- A higher percentage of residents in Channahon hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 19.1% compared to 16.1% in Richland.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.