Demographics details for Channahon, IL vs Little rock, AR

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Channahon, IL vs Little rock, AR.

Data Channahon Little rock
Population 13,926 202,864
Median Age 38.6 years 36.6 years
Median Income $112,771 $58,697
Married Families 47.0% 32.0%
Poverty Level 4% 14%
Unemployment Rate 4.2 3.7

Population Comparison: Channahon vs Little rock

  • The population in Little rock is higher at 202,864, compared to 13,926 in Channahon.
  • Residents in Channahon have a higher median age of 38.6 years compared to 36.6 years in Little rock.
  • Channahon has a higher median income of $112,771 compared to $58,697 in Little rock.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Channahon at 47.0% compared to 32.0% in Little rock.
  • The poverty level is higher in Little rock at 14%, compared to 4% in Channahon.
  • The unemployment rate in Channahon is higher at 4.2%, compared to 3.7% in Little rock.

Demographics

Demographics Channahon vs Little rock provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Channahon Little rock
Black 1 41
White 85 44
Asian Data is updating 3
Hispanic 12 8
Two or More Races 2 4
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Channahon vs Little rock

  • In Little rock, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 41% compared to 1% in Channahon.
  • Channahon has a higher percentage of White residents at 85% compared to 44% in Little rock.
  • In Little rock, the Asian population stands at 3%, greater than 0% in Channahon.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Channahon at 12% compared to 8% in Little rock.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Little rock at 4%, compared to 2% in Channahon.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Channahon and Little rock at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Channahon Little rock
Mental Health Not Good 14.6% 16.9%
Physical Health Not Good 9.5% 12.0%
Depression 20.2% 21.9%
Smoking 13.8% 19.0%
Binge Drinking 18.9% 12.9%
Obesity 33.1% 39.0%
Disability Percentage 9.0% 13.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Channahon vs Little rock

  • In Little rock, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 16.9% compared to 14.6% in Channahon.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Little rock at 21.9% versus 20.2% in Channahon.
  • Little rock has a higher smoking rate at 19.0% compared to 13.8% in Channahon.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Channahon at 18.9% compared to 12.9% in Little rock.
  • Little rock has higher obesity rates at 39.0% compared to 33.1% in Channahon.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Little rock at 13.0% compared to 9.0% in Channahon.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Channahon Little rock
No Schooling 0.5% (72) 0.7% (1,359)
High School Diploma 14.0% (1,945) 12.2% (24,667)
Less than High School 3.9% (544) 7.3% (14,766)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 19.1% (2,663) 29.4% (59,641)

Education Levels Comparison: Channahon vs Little rock

  • In Little rock, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.7% compared to 0.5% in Channahon.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Channahon hold a high school diploma at 14.0% compared to 12.2% in Little rock.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Little rock at 7.3%, compared to 3.9% in Channahon.
  • In Little rock, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 29.4% compared to 19.1% in Channahon.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.