Demographics details for Channahon, IL vs Killeen, TX
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Channahon, IL vs Killeen, TX.
| Data | Channahon | Killeen |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 13,926 | 159,172 |
| Median Age | 38.6 years | 29.7 years |
| Median Income | $112,771 | $57,086 |
| Married Families | 47.0% | 35.0% |
| Poverty Level | 4% | 15% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.2 | 6.0 |
Population Comparison: Channahon vs Killeen
- The population in Killeen is higher at 159,172, compared to 13,926 in Channahon.
- Residents in Channahon have a higher median age of 38.6 years compared to 29.7 years in Killeen.
- Channahon has a higher median income of $112,771 compared to $57,086 in Killeen.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Channahon at 47.0% compared to 35.0% in Killeen.
- The poverty level is higher in Killeen at 15%, compared to 4% in Channahon.
- Killeen has a higher unemployment rate at 6.0% compared to 4.2% in Channahon.
Demographics
Demographics Channahon vs Killeen provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Channahon | Killeen |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 1 | 38 |
| White | 85 | 18 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 4 |
| Hispanic | 12 | 27 |
| Two or More Races | 2 | 12 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Channahon vs Killeen
- In Killeen, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 38% compared to 1% in Channahon.
- Channahon has a higher percentage of White residents at 85% compared to 18% in Killeen.
- In Killeen, the Asian population stands at 4%, greater than 0% in Channahon.
- Killeen has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 27%, compared to 12% in Channahon.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Killeen at 12%, compared to 2% in Channahon.
- In Killeen, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Channahon.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Channahon | Killeen |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 14.6% | 18.3% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 9.5% | 13.1% |
| Depression | 20.2% | 22.5% |
| Smoking | 13.8% | 19.1% |
| Binge Drinking | 18.9% | 15.4% |
| Obesity | 33.1% | 42.0% |
| Disability Percentage | 9.0% | 13.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Channahon vs Killeen
- In Killeen, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.3% compared to 14.6% in Channahon.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Killeen at 22.5% versus 20.2% in Channahon.
- Killeen has a higher smoking rate at 19.1% compared to 13.8% in Channahon.
- Binge drinking is more common in Channahon at 18.9% compared to 15.4% in Killeen.
- Killeen has higher obesity rates at 42.0% compared to 33.1% in Channahon.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Killeen at 13.0% compared to 9.0% in Channahon.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Channahon | Killeen |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.5% (72) | 0.7% (1,076) |
| High School Diploma | 14.0% (1,945) | 13.1% (20,789) |
| Less than High School | 3.9% (544) | 7.5% (11,859) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 19.1% (2,663) | 12.7% (20,234) |
Education Levels Comparison: Channahon vs Killeen
- In Killeen, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.7% compared to 0.5% in Channahon.
- A higher percentage of residents in Channahon hold a high school diploma at 14.0% compared to 13.1% in Killeen.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Killeen at 7.5%, compared to 3.9% in Channahon.
- A higher percentage of residents in Channahon hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 19.1% compared to 12.7% in Killeen.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.