Demographics details for Channahon, IL vs Garland, TX
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Channahon, IL vs Garland, TX.
| Data | Channahon | Garland |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 13,926 | 240,854 |
| Median Age | 38.6 years | 34.4 years |
| Median Income | $112,771 | $71,044 |
| Married Families | 47.0% | 39.0% |
| Poverty Level | 4% | 12% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.2 | 4.0 |
Population Comparison: Channahon vs Garland
- The population in Garland is higher at 240,854, compared to 13,926 in Channahon.
- Residents in Channahon have a higher median age of 38.6 years compared to 34.4 years in Garland.
- Channahon has a higher median income of $112,771 compared to $71,044 in Garland.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Channahon at 47.0% compared to 39.0% in Garland.
- The poverty level is higher in Garland at 12%, compared to 4% in Channahon.
- The unemployment rate in Channahon is higher at 4.2%, compared to 4.0% in Garland.
Demographics
Demographics Channahon vs Garland provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Channahon | Garland |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 1 | 16 |
| White | 85 | 6 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 11 |
| Hispanic | 12 | 45 |
| Two or More Races | 2 | 21 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Channahon vs Garland
- In Garland, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 16% compared to 1% in Channahon.
- Channahon has a higher percentage of White residents at 85% compared to 6% in Garland.
- In Garland, the Asian population stands at 11%, greater than 0% in Channahon.
- Garland has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 45%, compared to 12% in Channahon.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Garland at 21%, compared to 2% in Channahon.
- In Garland, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Channahon.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Channahon | Garland |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 14.6% | 17.1% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 9.5% | 12.1% |
| Depression | 20.2% | 22.2% |
| Smoking | 13.8% | 17.2% |
| Binge Drinking | 18.9% | 17.6% |
| Obesity | 33.1% | 33.9% |
| Disability Percentage | 9.0% | 9.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Channahon vs Garland
- In Garland, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.1% compared to 14.6% in Channahon.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Garland at 22.2% versus 20.2% in Channahon.
- Garland has a higher smoking rate at 17.2% compared to 13.8% in Channahon.
- Binge drinking is more common in Channahon at 18.9% compared to 17.6% in Garland.
- Garland has higher obesity rates at 33.9% compared to 33.1% in Channahon.
- Disability percentages are the same in both Channahon and Garland at 9.0%.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Channahon | Garland |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.5% (72) | 2.5% (6,080) |
| High School Diploma | 14.0% (1,945) | 13.9% (33,524) |
| Less than High School | 3.9% (544) | 24.7% (59,406) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 19.1% (2,663) | 15.5% (37,249) |
Education Levels Comparison: Channahon vs Garland
- In Garland, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.5% compared to 0.5% in Channahon.
- A higher percentage of residents in Channahon hold a high school diploma at 14.0% compared to 13.9% in Garland.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Garland at 24.7%, compared to 3.9% in Channahon.
- A higher percentage of residents in Channahon hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 19.1% compared to 15.5% in Garland.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.