Demographics details for Channahon, IL vs Ephrata, WA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Channahon, IL vs Ephrata, WA.
| Data | Channahon | Ephrata |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 13,926 | 8,476 |
| Median Age | 38.6 years | 33.4 years |
| Median Income | $112,771 | $57,958 |
| Married Families | 47.0% | 33.0% |
| Poverty Level | 4% | 11% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.2 | 4.2 |
Population Comparison: Channahon vs Ephrata
- In Channahon, the population is higher at 13,926, compared to 8,476 in Ephrata.
- Residents in Channahon have a higher median age of 38.6 years compared to 33.4 years in Ephrata.
- Channahon has a higher median income of $112,771 compared to $57,958 in Ephrata.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Channahon at 47.0% compared to 33.0% in Ephrata.
- The poverty level is higher in Ephrata at 11%, compared to 4% in Channahon.
- The unemployment rate is the same in both Channahon and Ephrata at 4.2%.
Demographics
Demographics Channahon vs Ephrata provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Channahon | Ephrata |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 1 | 1 |
| White | 85 | 63 |
| Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 12 | 25 |
| Two or More Races | 2 | 11 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Channahon vs Ephrata
- The percentage of Black residents is the same in both Channahon and Ephrata at 1%.
- Channahon has a higher percentage of White residents at 85% compared to 63% in Ephrata.
- Both Channahon and Ephrata have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- Ephrata has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 25%, compared to 12% in Channahon.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Ephrata at 11%, compared to 2% in Channahon.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Channahon and Ephrata at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Channahon | Ephrata |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 14.6% | 18.0% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 9.5% | 12.7% |
| Depression | 20.2% | 27.0% |
| Smoking | 13.8% | 17.0% |
| Binge Drinking | 18.9% | 17.6% |
| Obesity | 33.1% | 35.1% |
| Disability Percentage | 9.0% | 8.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Channahon vs Ephrata
- In Ephrata, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.0% compared to 14.6% in Channahon.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Ephrata at 27.0% versus 20.2% in Channahon.
- Ephrata has a higher smoking rate at 17.0% compared to 13.8% in Channahon.
- Binge drinking is more common in Channahon at 18.9% compared to 17.6% in Ephrata.
- Ephrata has higher obesity rates at 35.1% compared to 33.1% in Channahon.
- Disability percentages are higher in Channahon at 9.0% compared to 8.0% in Ephrata.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Channahon | Ephrata |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.5% (72) | 0.8% (65) |
| High School Diploma | 14.0% (1,945) | 17.7% (1,503) |
| Less than High School | 3.9% (544) | 14.4% (1,223) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 19.1% (2,663) | 8.0% (677) |
Education Levels Comparison: Channahon vs Ephrata
- In Ephrata, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.8% compared to 0.5% in Channahon.
- In Ephrata, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 17.7% compared to 14.0% in Channahon.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Ephrata at 14.4%, compared to 3.9% in Channahon.
- A higher percentage of residents in Channahon hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 19.1% compared to 8.0% in Ephrata.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.