Demographics details for Channahon, IL vs Crawford, NE
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Channahon, IL vs Crawford, NE.
Data | Channahon | Crawford |
---|---|---|
Population | 13,926 | 838 |
Median Age | 38.6 years | 52.1 years |
Median Income | $112,771 | $54,167 |
Married Families | 47.0% | 60.0% |
Poverty Level | 4% | 10% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.2 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Channahon vs Crawford
- In Channahon, the population is higher at 13,926, compared to 838 in Crawford.
- The median age in Crawford is higher at 52.1 years, compared to 38.6 years in Channahon.
- Channahon has a higher median income of $112,771 compared to $54,167 in Crawford.
- In Crawford, the percentage of married families is higher at 60.0%, compared to 47.0% in Channahon.
- The poverty level is higher in Crawford at 10%, compared to 4% in Channahon.
- The unemployment rate in Channahon is higher at 4.2%, compared to 3.5% in Crawford.
Demographics
Demographics Channahon vs Crawford provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Channahon | Crawford |
---|---|---|
Black | 1 | Data is updating |
White | 85 | 76 |
Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 12 | 15 |
Two or More Races | 2 | 3 |
American Indian | Data is updating | 6 |
Demographics Comparison: Channahon vs Crawford
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Channahon at 1% compared to 0% in Crawford.
- Channahon has a higher percentage of White residents at 85% compared to 76% in Crawford.
- Both Channahon and Crawford have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- Crawford has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 15%, compared to 12% in Channahon.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Crawford at 3%, compared to 2% in Channahon.
- In Crawford, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 6%, compared to 0% in Channahon.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Channahon | Crawford |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 14.6% | 13.8% |
Physical Health Not Good | 9.5% | 9.4% |
Depression | 20.2% | 18.9% |
Smoking | 13.8% | 15.7% |
Binge Drinking | 18.9% | 20.0% |
Obesity | 33.1% | 40.3% |
Disability Percentage | 9.0% | 14.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Channahon vs Crawford
- More residents in Channahon report poor mental health at 14.6% compared to 13.8% in Crawford.
- Depression is more prevalent in Channahon at 20.2% compared to 18.9% in Crawford.
- Crawford has a higher smoking rate at 15.7% compared to 13.8% in Channahon.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Crawford at 20.0% compared to 18.9% in Channahon.
- Crawford has higher obesity rates at 40.3% compared to 33.1% in Channahon.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Crawford at 14.0% compared to 9.0% in Channahon.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Channahon | Crawford |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.5% (72) | 0.6% (5) |
High School Diploma | 14.0% (1,945) | 30.2% (253) |
Less than High School | 3.9% (544) | 6.0% (50) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 19.1% (2,663) | 17.1% (143) |
Education Levels Comparison: Channahon vs Crawford
- In Crawford, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.6% compared to 0.5% in Channahon.
- In Crawford, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 30.2% compared to 14.0% in Channahon.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Crawford at 6.0%, compared to 3.9% in Channahon.
- A higher percentage of residents in Channahon hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 19.1% compared to 17.1% in Crawford.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.